Re: [dhcwg] Lifetime draft: refresh time should never be more than IRT_DEFAULT
Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Tue, 09 November 2004 19:19 UTC
Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA02908; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 14:19:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CRbR8-0008FQ-Ao; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 14:13:50 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CRbKc-0006zi-Rp for dhcwg@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 14:07:06 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA01790 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 14:07:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from shell-ng.nominum.com ([81.200.64.181]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CRbLQ-0003rQ-Q8 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 14:07:57 -0500
Received: from [10.67.86.31] (unknown [130.129.97.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by shell-ng.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664C256889; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 11:06:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mellon@nominum.com)
In-Reply-To: <28895635.1100024120896.JavaMail.root@wamui06.slb.atl.earthlink.net>
References: <28895635.1100024120896.JavaMail.root@wamui06.slb.atl.earthlink.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <76011F4F-3282-11D9-AA52-000A95D6A618@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Lifetime draft: refresh time should never be more than IRT_DEFAULT
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 14:06:29 -0500
To: kck@netcom.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7bac9cb154eb5790ae3b2913587a40de
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Nov 9, 2004, at 1:15 PM, kck@netcom.com wrote: > The amount of damage that can be done in 1 day or even 1 hour is > great. Not sure a TTL is really the device > to protect against a DoS attack What you say is true, but not compelling. I would rather that something that can be accomplished with ten minutes' access to the network not last indefinitely - it's better for a machine to be offline for a day than for an unbounded period of time. _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] Lifetime draft: refresh time should never… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Lifetime draft: refresh time should n… Stig Venaas
- Re: [dhcwg] Lifetime draft: refresh time should n… Tim Chown
- Re: [dhcwg] Lifetime draft: refresh time should n… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Lifetime draft: refresh time should n… Stig Venaas
- Re: [dhcwg] Lifetime draft: refresh time should n… kck
- Re: [dhcwg] Lifetime draft: refresh time should n… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Lifetime draft: refresh time should n… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Lifetime draft: refresh time should n… Ted Lemon
- RE: [dhcwg] Lifetime draft: refresh time should n… Bernie Volz
- Re: [dhcwg] Lifetime draft: refresh time should n… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Lifetime draft: refresh time should n… Stig Venaas
- Re: [dhcwg] Lifetime draft: refresh time should n… Stig Venaas
- Re: [dhcwg] Lifetime draft: refresh time should n… Joe Quanaim
- Re: [dhcwg] Lifetime draft: refresh time should n… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Lifetime draft: refresh time should n… Stig Venaas