[dhcwg] draft-li-intarea-nat64-prefix-dhcp-option-00.txt

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Tue, 14 March 2017 10:30 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=12461710fe=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AEAF128AB0 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 03:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=jordi.palet@consulintel.es header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5I9IpoXv4-Kg for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 03:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [217.126.185.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9C141293DC for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 03:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1489487410; x=1490092210; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:CC:Message-ID: Thread-Topic:Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding: Reply-To; bh=Jj9K8bkcP0cJsNVAIk+Bu4f9qvND0yr6skQd/FXbdMY=; b=oiF MiPoDxiimbqydR01akW4yuHImNrbN79rA3X0ZxUW+D5dUm1mLR0tujSuc6oPpNwY 0Zus58urrIop9ExnI2VqCo/0F005WKatl1S2d+lO/Zl2xmS8bq4ZLutbhzjCHkqC t2TQu0pboGIk0+BhgkT16/sHTAbYil23T+nYH0ds=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=gk2x8pEEfmc0okFrAcaBSQX37Q9JM2BJIRRi67vDtPwwOpo3b0zJZizv7Epl YLnMD7TfKG19y/NchjQCGkhb8cTXBlRmK1KBUgJVwrtidxISIfCiIIX/Y 9LeLFC8jI90UxKpmGmiM9AcGfrTwhGyDbKxp3PgT4j3JWDi9ZikObM=;
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:30:10 +0100
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:30:04 +0100
Received: from [10.10.10.99] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50005386342.msg for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:30:04 +0100
X-MDOP-RefID: re=0.000,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-HashCash: 1:20:170314:md50005386342::MxBAlxHSd5O7lGtK:000006pO
X-Return-Path: prvs=12461710fe=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: dhcwg@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1f.0.170216
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:30:00 +0100
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: <v6op@ietf.org>, <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C3C3A25B-1448-41DD-86A3-24F6DEF834CF@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: draft-li-intarea-nat64-prefix-dhcp-option-00.txt
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/L8RvEDmaUe052o28UkVBtzxkRss>
Cc: int-area@ietf.org
Subject: [dhcwg] draft-li-intarea-nat64-prefix-dhcp-option-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 10:30:15 -0000

Hi,

We have submitted a new ID, in order to standardize new DHCPv6 options to allow the discovery of the IPv6/IPv4 prefixes served by stateful/stateless NAT64 translators (which can be used by SIIT, Stateful NAT64/464XLAT, EAM-SIIT, etc.).

DHCPv6 Options for Discovery NAT64 Prefixes
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-intarea-nat64-prefix-dhcp-option

This is an update of a previous work (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cui-intarea-464xlat-prefix-dhcp-00), which was considering only the 464XLAT case.

There have been similar solutions for DS-LITE/lw4o6/MAP, etc.

As v6ops can’t do “new” protocols, neither DHCP standardize new options, it has been submitted to int-area, but we believe that is relevant to both v6ops and DHCP, so please, read the document and provide inputs.

Thanks!

Regards,
Jordi




**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.