IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Load Balancing for DHCPv6

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Thu, 13 September 2012 03:15 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4353D21E803A for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0wLebRzGZBIX for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:15:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8892C21E8034 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:15:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2114; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1347506152; x=1348715752; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=XDS+zgfFIJMinMbhxAwuSfowlYi5d+RjZy+87dZTOMQ=; b=izGBlIHhdBNCyZ6rGa7pnvv12I/kfgdBFBYNhtv6RgEKBxp7V0i1QGuH cKuWcv/AJYm7DN+UlfkGEh4Onc0oWaWbcjdFh76YLbNizVEck3oVvWQ9u T0k5vdWoHWjvbssgqJ1LTUjjN7abj+GBwRFAGI95HOYWmEZo9zwebGLP+ g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAFAK5OUVCtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABCA7tygQeCIAEBAQQBAQEPASc0CwwEAgEIDgMEAQEBChQJByEGCxQJCAIEAQ0FCBqHXAMMC5tWllgNiU8Eii1jgx6CRGADlAqMaoMhgWmCZoIX
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,413,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="121092041"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Sep 2012 03:15:52 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com [173.37.183.83]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8D3FptQ027206 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 13 Sep 2012 03:15:51 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.159]) by xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([173.37.183.83]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 22:15:51 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Load Balancing for DHCPv6
Thread-Index: AQHNj2xDaJ+khP2NkUiXQs2wUqwOeJeHnBuA
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 03:15:50 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E0F4FDEBC@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
References: <CAL10_Bqa4ftiVhyyf0ezwKR7mzAEOLNi_K3EJFPFUzPnz7QGPw@mail.gmail.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E0F4F3093@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <CAL10_Br=OcWZuar1fDOopevTy_W-3g9TsYqo61rOWm4tKkuYgg@mail.gmail.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E61118003F@GAALPA1MSGUSR9N.ITServices.sbc.com> <CAL10_BpXdx03WfV1PeMKg1zYc1dAFKe1CDNdrcNf45+_EVCBPg@mail.gmail.com> <CDDB9016-BE11-489A-9361-0172D96A464C@nominum.com> <CAOpJ=k2CJS=FuUvFwOq=s2m871_qfo=xROsW=fx0E48w2wxAqQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAL10_BoLsdppYKNSfHheYrZg+SfaggoynQf2X11HEdy=ELFUiQ@mail.gmail.com> <5049C317.7090603@gmail.com> <94FA926F-2432-4AE7-BC20-AE7458AB40D9@cisco.com> <CAF4+nEHqRFHbz9qfQuOqpLCNeZqkT=+f53_eCboECfWX8QCt6A@mail.gmail.com> <71F17433-B2D9-4366-9B32-F0E4D294EDB5@nominum.com> <CAF4+nEE6pbmO_ss+3UEpRG1kh2YD20P2KD4CFQ7LwoRZ6gyxsg@mail.gmail.com> <A563FEA0-0A26-431D-BDAA-AD897F691754@nominum.com> <CAF4+nEHbazyx9M982pZ1w8n14xiY_re-Gjy0XXbGbxrtE3jMvg@mail.gmail.com> <D4B0BD6B-A05C-4B9D-B9AD-894323D0B916@nominum.com> <CAL10_Bp8Q-FkVvGT0rFjV3PE1rDGk6iEFOpzaHe7jFMGHnYjpg@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEGZWA65eSWY_8ncaEa6qdwoyxrStrLXQrCP77h5AHL4LA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEGZWA65eSWY_8ncaEa6qdwoyxrStrLXQrCP77h5AHL4LA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.254.215]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19180.000
x-tm-as-result: No--48.841700-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Load Balancing for DHCPv6
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 03:15:53 -0000

One comment on the draft is that I think it needs to be clear that load balancing is ONLY used for DHCPv6 client messages that do not include a server-identifier option (this is Solicit, Information-Request (if no server-identifier option), Rebind, and Confirm). Load balancing MUST NOT be used if a server-identifier option exists in the client's message, as then only that server should respond.

- Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Donald Eastlake
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 11:52 AM
To: Andre Kostur
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org; Ted Lemon
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Load Balancing for DHCPv6

Moving this to a WG draft seems reasonable.

It appears that it is hard for several different reasons (the grad student who did all the work is gone, Brian is now fully retired and about to go on a month's vacation, etc...) for Brian Carpenter to just run the same test on Pearson but he can probably do some lesser amount of testing. I'm continuing to converse with him on this...

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA  d3e3e3@gmail.com

On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 8, 2012, at 7:35 PM, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > How much of a rush is there on this?
>>
>> I don't think there's a huge rush, but Andre might disagree... :)
>>
>
> Other than keeping the draft moving along....
>
> Does the WG want to take this on as a working item?  I think we can 
> get that part of the draft process resolved (and possibly publish
> draft-ietf-dhc-loadbv6-00) while we're waiting for the results of 
> Pearson vs. FNV.
>
> --
> Andre Kostur
_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email