[dhcwg] Fwd: Kernel implementation of DANIR for IoT Router - DHCPv6-PD and ND

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 16 September 2019 07:25 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0CD212080D for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 00:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.891
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.891 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DC_PNG_UNO_LARGO=0.001, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, SPOOFED_FREEMAIL=1.739] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OLNheRn7U2RR for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 00:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B299B120809 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 00:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x8G7Pplj151496 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:25:51 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 55DDB202C76 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:25:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40730202C39 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:25:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.11.240.42] ([10.11.240.42]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x8G7PfeE027819 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:25:41 +0200
References: <c7e54351-9096-53e7-0322-cf7d0abc58f2@gmail.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <c7e54351-9096-53e7-0322-cf7d0abc58f2@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <740671f9-6e68-70ac-8dd2-91f9d24b965d@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:25:41 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c7e54351-9096-53e7-0322-cf7d0abc58f2@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------CA1B983301E960A006AD4F2C"
Content-Language: fr
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/Lj9VwKid0-Z8fhBkY_zJYhHrLf4>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:17:56 -0700
Subject: [dhcwg] Fwd: Kernel implementation of DANIR for IoT Router - DHCPv6-PD and ND
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 07:25:57 -0000

Hello to participants in DHC WG,

One might be interested in this kernel implementation of DHCPv6-PD parts.

Yours,

Alex and Dmytro


-------- Message transféré --------
Sujet : 	Kernel implementation of DANIR for IoT Router - DHCPv6-PD and ND
Date : 	Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:21:46 +0200
De : 	Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Pour : 	v6ops@ietf.org <v6ops@ietf.org>



Hi,

The kernel implementation of DANIR for IoT Router was finally working a 
few weeks ago.

It is an implementation of draft-shytyi-v6ops-danir-03.txt.  This is the 
right thing to do, instead of '64share' RFC7278.

In this video one can see the kernel in the IoT Router issues a DHCPv6 
PD request on its egress and obtains a /56; it then makes several /64s 
out of it and subsequently sends RAs with these on the ingress interfaces.

The DHCPv6 server is took off-the-shelf.  The PDP part is not present in 
the IoT Router, but we expect it to work ok on a ptp link on a cellular 
network to a smartphone.

The video recorded the virtual machines output on the IoT Router 
(featured below), the Client device behind it, and the DHCPv6-PD server.

https://youtu.be/DymVQY7bCUM


Yours,

Alexandre PETRESCU and Dmytro SHYTYI

PS: we will soon post the source code on github.