IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue-03 - Respond by 10/10/2016

yogendra pal <jntupal@gmail.com> Sat, 01 October 2016 18:35 UTC

Return-Path: <jntupal@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA3012B0A8 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Oct 2016 11:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4vpAPlZLrCXA for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Oct 2016 11:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A850112B02E for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Oct 2016 11:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id 197so15330998wmk.1 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 01 Oct 2016 11:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=trk8OBSyxR79+NeqhGQky+o6V/A2GcKi1KLAPGm1OtY=; b=DwtY+Qdcj3rZutRlirKL6VdVsAcN/wIxuxcAhSSJ1/i/lm66CfqLB734ikvLOCO/3k 37MSpLpxaETTwfmupoGJndBwZN+RJJ3kIgsubI/CFSWl1BLX/1jSU1x4NwGbbnvOrAhH lb3C5rDUEFpHjKbidr6rx48zJzyT9rCyCmsGgaflAykTbir5s7Iw5/kerdFz8zbfqS3h ToTt5rGOFmoVmgp+o9P86KrYdjjmfCEwkJyZsZhZdhOW2RYCpwoUEJ6t49wlONvCHZ7N CJxU6j6yOkPQZn8cIBzBZMEafGn3xhYK/smygs2fbZo6FtwQnD1MGOWL0X/KBOiz/+rc Vp6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=trk8OBSyxR79+NeqhGQky+o6V/A2GcKi1KLAPGm1OtY=; b=Ld0taAiVDWaH8kxcRPYxcBvvWlBcIHqsyWAHNSaP3nZ//hgpI9ECKTrL0F4uhPjYye PE1k2SPU3ipWK0+cojcUcA+VnRbrckyC9+CJyWegR6UwOuJK7eS4CsBE99+fDefmyl/Y 0Tt0yaSVukzMB1gL8gLW+SBNb9PWimlNFqpGqISLJuJtiGsMNDrST06o+kAKDWVEe1yC yBC3nK6kqOvNHKbWdvcR/D/BAR9NsyjHAyrpuIok6Je3AJqv8rNc9VP7L/jsO5/VIGZ/ 2mJKcdZC9rYcBd6RDXW6I8mODaQp8hKVP8AgklGCOL/ml460DhhDKbojTix2B6g5i9s4 r2tA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rli6vNK3JDAykOjuNPhLOi3k/CTrxoMFg2FUHV4H1EaDMCQAQaXFKIjyZ7f5VglnxzOPjiO3M10O66MMg==
X-Received: by 10.28.107.22 with SMTP id g22mr2761032wmc.31.1475346945117; Sat, 01 Oct 2016 11:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.154.228 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Oct 2016 11:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFx+hEPeWbmRnSoBai_gvE6GyZBmgEbZh0RHOyjgGMWRYgxbZg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a972247331c442d2a1a5bd05b48764bc@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <CAFx+hEPeWbmRnSoBai_gvE6GyZBmgEbZh0RHOyjgGMWRYgxbZg@mail.gmail.com>
From: yogendra pal <jntupal@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2016 00:05:44 +0530
Message-ID: <CA+dB4X4L6v6baCvNxCYpSpJkMbZx+yWvPSOn22qgOQOOb=Er5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: tianxiang li <peter416733@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1146563c959422053dd1fa72"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/M5Eal51M4gbTvoxrlFPeJ2p1zZU>
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue-03 - Respond by 10/10/2016
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2016 18:35:48 -0000

I support moving this document forward. As we're implementer of PD in our
product, I see value in clear guidance from this document.

Thanks,
Yogendra Pal



On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 9:04 AM, tianxiang li <peter416733@gmail.com> wrote:

> Being one of the co-authors of this document, I support advancing this
> document.
>
> The prefix-length hint issues draft clarifies the client and server
> behavior regarding the DHCPv6 prefix-length hint, which was not specified
> in any previous documents, and it meets the actual need of  some operators.
> The draft has been presented several times in the previous IETF meetings,
> and has received a substantial number of reviews and comments. We'd like to
> thank all the people who helped out with this draft and provided their
> valuable comments. We've resolved most issues regarding the prefix-length
> hint and we believe that the document is ready to move forward.
>
> Thank you,
> Tianxiang
>
> 2016-09-27 10:34 GMT+08:00 Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com>:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> This message starts the DHC Working Group Last Call to advance
>> draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue-03, DHCPv6 Prefix Length
>> Hint Issues. This document¹s intended status is Proposed Standard. At
>> present, there is no IPR file against this document.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please send your comments by October 10, 2016. If you do not feel this
>>  document should advance, please state your reasons why.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bernie Volz is the assigned shepherd.
>>
>>
>>
>> - Tomek & Bernie
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcwg mailing list
>> dhcwg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status