[dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-layer-addr-opt

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 21 September 2012 12:08 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4FF21F8634 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 05:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.247
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.247 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.248, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_35=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i-hAGmLWeiRz for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 05:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og101.obsmtp.com (exprod7og101.obsmtp.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C038A21F86F3 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 05:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob101.postini.com ([]) with SMTP ID DSNKUFxY0urUC01fsVIvqxHx8Jf10aqx2LCm@postini.com; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 05:08:50 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BC91B829B for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 05:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com []) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7992E19005C for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 05:08:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([]) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 05:08:42 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-layer-addr-opt
Thread-Index: Ac2X8ddMOw/OIH/tQHCVi0DiBXN4ZA==
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:08:41 +0000
Message-ID: <BF22E1BC-0E6B-4245-95C4-95E8B0F210B0@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <AF1AD007495619478328E5E87E9C283F@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-layer-addr-opt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:08:51 -0000

The authors have sub,tired a new version of this document to address concerns raised in the previous WGLC. If you participated in the previous WGLC or want to participate now, please review the (short) draft and send comments to the mailing list if you have any.  Also please indicate whether you support advancing the draft at this time or not.

We will evaluate consensus on October 5.