IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Lifetime draft: refresh time should never be more than IRT_DEFAULT

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Tue, 09 November 2004 16:34 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA16884; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 11:34:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CRYmj-0008B6-R8; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 11:23:57 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CRYey-0003f8-26 for dhcwg@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 11:15:56 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA14697 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 11:15:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from raven.ecs.soton.ac.uk ([152.78.70.1]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CRYfj-0007mE-89 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 11:16:44 -0500
Received: from magpie.ecs.soton.ac.uk (magpie.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.68.131]) by raven.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iA9GFmGn021259 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:15:48 GMT
Received: from login.ecs.soton.ac.uk (IDENT:root@login [152.78.68.162]) by magpie.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA02957 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:15:46 GMT
Received: (from tjc@localhost) by login.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) id iA9GFkS32291 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:15:46 GMT
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 16:15:46 +0000
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Lifetime draft: refresh time should never be more than IRT_DEFAULT
Message-ID: <20041109161546.GC28304@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Mail-Followup-To: dhcwg@ietf.org
References: <E0AD8372-3255-11D9-AA52-000A95D6A618@nominum.com> <20041109151735.GH15501@sverresborg.uninett.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20041109151735.GH15501@sverresborg.uninett.no>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact helpdesk@ecs.soton.ac.uk for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: tjc@smtp.ecs.soton.ac.uk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7bac9cb154eb5790ae3b2913587a40de
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org

On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 04:17:35PM +0100, Stig Venaas wrote:
> 
> To use the DNS ttl analogy, there's nothing stopping you from setting
> a needlessly large ttl value either.

Right, but the draft can state the issues and leave it for the admin to
make an informed choice.
 
-- 
Tim

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status