Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: Kernel implementation of DANIR for IoT Router - DHCPv6-PD and ND

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 18 September 2019 07:45 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A687120125 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:45:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.631
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vONgVRMZJNoA for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92CCC12004E for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x8I7jADd020709; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 09:45:10 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E2D7203024; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 09:45:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224D4200DAF; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 09:45:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x8I7jAhJ022827; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 09:45:10 +0200
To: Li HUANG <bleuoisou@gmail.com>
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
References: <c7e54351-9096-53e7-0322-cf7d0abc58f2@gmail.com> <740671f9-6e68-70ac-8dd2-91f9d24b965d@gmail.com> <CAGGiuEbxbw67MgKUCcZcp0KsYoiewXogrynFU7b3HThOY6FD-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAGGiuEbksPxKV6GLA06A7untZOrwpYKnb_Ycu50ibb9cvzNtxg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4561ca6d-4611-27e8-5cb3-16e72075fa65@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 09:45:09 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGGiuEbksPxKV6GLA06A7untZOrwpYKnb_Ycu50ibb9cvzNtxg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/MWUEHKk4twgyAqC-UiGLt6HlRqE>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: Kernel implementation of DANIR for IoT Router - DHCPv6-PD and ND
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 07:45:14 -0000

Dear Li,

Please help me understand:

What do you mean by 'apt windows'?

Alex

Le 18/09/2019 à 07:39, Li HUANG a écrit :
> 09:39.hk <http://39.hk/> S8 Sept 17th 2019
> 
> 
> Thank you dhcwg returning on this,
> 
> 
> 
> IoT either PTP to dhcpv6 pd server sounds very like the running 
> preferially to wireless, or phone networks instead of apt windows that 
> blocked wwan, wlan services of it ...
> 
> 
> To the kernel apart, OEM user would principle following its offered 
> updates of system, in case dhcpv6 required update, how would clients 
> obey protocol rcf 3315, 8415, 6260 whilst OEM warranty contract to get 
> all none conflicts?
> 
> 
> Microsoft is one putting on tracking, it must be forwarded to them about.
> 
> 
> Let have your kind advises on it please .
> 
> 
> 
> Sincerely yours
> Li HUANG
> 
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019, 10:48 Li HUANG <bleuoisou@gmail.com 
> <mailto:bleuoisou@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     09:39.hk <http://39.hk> S8 Sept 17th 2019
> 
> 
>     Thank you dhcwg returning on this,
> 
> 
> 
>     IoT either PTP to dhcpv6 pd server sounds very like the running
>     preferially to wireless, or phone networks instead of apt windows
>     that blocked wwan, wlan services of it ...
> 
> 
>     To the kernel apart, OEM user would principle following its offered
>     updates of system, in case dhcpv6 required update, how would clients
>     obey protocol rcf 3315, 8415, 6260 whilst OEM warranty contract to
>     get all none conflicts?
> 
> 
>     Microsoft is one putting on tracking, it must be forwarded to them
>     about.
> 
> 
>     Let have your kind advises on it please .
> 
> 
> 
>     Sincerely yours
>     Li HUANG
> 
> 
>     On Tue, Sep 17, 2019, 00:18 Alexandre Petrescu
>     <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com <mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>>
>     wrote:
> 
>         Hello to participants in DHC WG,
> 
>         One might be interested in this kernel implementation of
>         DHCPv6-PD parts.
> 
>         Yours,
> 
>         Alex and Dmytro
> 
> 
>         -------- Message transféré --------
>         Sujet : 	Kernel implementation of DANIR for IoT Router -
>         DHCPv6-PD and ND
>         Date : 	Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:21:46 +0200
>         De : 	Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
>         <mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
>         Pour : 	v6ops@ietf.org <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org> <v6ops@ietf.org>
>         <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
> 
> 
> 
>         Hi,
> 
>         The kernel implementation of DANIR for IoT Router was finally
>         working a few weeks ago.
> 
>         It is an implementation of draft-shytyi-v6ops-danir-03.txt. 
>         This is the right thing to do, instead of '64share' RFC7278.
> 
>         In this video one can see the kernel in the IoT Router issues a
>         DHCPv6 PD request on its egress and obtains a /56; it then makes
>         several /64s out of it and subsequently sends RAs with these on
>         the ingress interfaces.
> 
>         The DHCPv6 server is took off-the-shelf.  The PDP part is not
>         present in the IoT Router, but we expect it to work ok on a ptp
>         link on a cellular network to a smartphone.
> 
>         The video recorded the virtual machines output on the IoT Router
>         (featured below), the Client device behind it, and the DHCPv6-PD
>         server.
> 
>         https://youtu.be/DymVQY7bCUM
> 
> 
>         Yours,
> 
>         Alexandre PETRESCU and Dmytro SHYTYI
> 
>         PS: we will soon post the source code on github.
> 
>         _______________________________________________
>         dhcwg mailing list
>         dhcwg@ietf.org <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
>         https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>