Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-01.txt

"Naiming Shen (naiming)" <naiming@cisco.com> Fri, 20 January 2017 23:41 UTC

Return-Path: <naiming@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6628F1295EC for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:41:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.72
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hqz6AZTSNSy7 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:41:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2046E1295EA for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:41:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3820; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1484955717; x=1486165317; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=eAjZEfo3U2VyxTNe2DLM6Ef0FUzb0fkWE2qy+y8S8bA=; b=Cc1Z+S4BJgo9uoaUaI0JwoeB33xEozSdM0SSUZjMSBQB385P2GX0GZYP JZtpatoH8zdy/PDqfQ3nTTRzVbpZtW46oOD6j7rmuBKgJQeY2QOGNKguH 71bPQPJICdF3VHJvMK+iUTzKiRDFU9OA+UqYU0fCqYxPf39XohE/lSoYV Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0C4AQCln4JY/4YNJK1eGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBgm9OAQEBAQEfgVgRB41UkWaQIoUrgg2GIgKCFT8UAQIBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BYyiEagZ5EAIBCAQ7BzIUEQIEDgWJBrFLikkBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEdiFAIgmOHfIIxBZtIAZFmkG6ScwEfOIFFFUoBhiRziByBDQEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,260,1477958400"; d="scan'208,217";a="201481455"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 20 Jan 2017 23:41:56 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (xch-rcd-001.cisco.com [173.37.102.11]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v0KNfuEm010211 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 23:41:56 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 17:41:55 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-004.cisco.com ([173.37.102.14]) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com ([173.37.102.14]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 17:41:55 -0600
From: "Naiming Shen (naiming)" <naiming@cisco.com>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSaG2j4iKFqR8HLUaBB5gDM0IMqqEsci2AgAk5dQCACYkFgIAACfsAgAAFswCAAAW9AIADMfsAgAAFRQA=
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 23:41:55 +0000
Message-ID: <18785629-66FF-44D0-B4A3-C7A6CDC2F73B@cisco.com>
References: <148374230973.17537.14402355403407250708.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <843031F0-B818-4C19-8120-78EE7D531E06@cisco.com> <4328855a5add4c3a9f044689171156f7@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <15E46807-72A1-49FC-8E67-A1967243EFA0@cisco.com> <5841cbedc07e485d8499006469968bb1@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <746A7C3D-B6A2-462B-91FF-1AE831715DE5@cisco.com> <31b8c717127f43928d0bcb8a5dc71aeb@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <5d5eef10e6d749be90f25e8a11d1f611@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5d5eef10e6d749be90f25e8a11d1f611@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.41.64.216]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1878562966FF44D0B4A3C7A6CDC2F73Bciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/MaE6Iuq8q66sNlhOOwfHAjquHl4>
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "Enke Chen \(enkechen\)" <enkechen@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 23:41:58 -0000

No problem Bernie. Thanks!

Regards,
- Naiming

On Jan 20, 2017, at 3:23 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com<mailto:volz@cisco.com>> wrote:

Hi:

After an offline discussion, I am fine with the general proposal of how the DHCPv6 handling is per the -01 draft. Sorry for my misunderstanding and the distraction.

-          Bernie