Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) OptionsforDHCPv6

Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org> Wed, 28 November 2007 09:36 UTC

Return-path: <dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxJLl-00036l-9k; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:36:57 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxJLj-00036a-K8 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:36:55 -0500
Received: from mx.isc.org ([2001:4f8:0:2::1c]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxJLj-0001x5-6q for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:36:55 -0500
Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:bb::5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "farside.isc.org", Issuer "ISC CA" (verified OK)) by mx.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA38114069 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:36:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Mark_Andrews@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost.isc.org [IPv6:::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "drugs.dv.isc.org", Issuer "ISC CA" (verified OK)) by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764ABE6056 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:36:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAS9Ulk7065582; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:30:56 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from marka@drugs.dv.isc.org)
Message-Id: <200711280930.lAS9Ulk7065582@drugs.dv.isc.org>
To: anthony.flavin@bt.com
From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
Subject: Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) OptionsforDHCPv6
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:13:12 -0000." <548EC156325C6340B2E85DF90CAE8586019A0008@E03MVB3-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:30:47 +1100
X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-)
X-Scan-Signature: f607d15ccc2bc4eaf3ade8ffa8af02a0
Cc: mayer@ntp.isc.org, mellon@fugue.com, ntpwg@lists.ntp.org, brad@shub-internet.org, dhcwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org

	They are not the only ISP that supplies time.  Optus does and
	I'm pretty sure Telstra also does.  My home box is sync'd to
	a Optus NTP server.

	Mark

> Perhaps some other ISP's involved with the NTPWG would care to comment
> on whether or not the poor practice of the past is still in place, or
> being replaced with best practice (which is to install their own
> servers, or reach an agreement for the use of somebody else's).=20
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brad Knowles [mailto:brad@shub-internet.org]=20
> Sent: 27 November 2007 18:42
> To: Flavin,AJ,Tony,DMJ R; brad@shub-internet.org; Mark_Andrews@isc.org
> Cc: mayer@ntp.isc.org; ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; mellon@fugue.com;
> rgayraud@cisco.com; dhcwg@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP)
> OptionsforDHCPv6
> 
> On 11/27/07, <anthony.flavin@bt.com> wrote:
> 
> >  Completely wrong.
> 
> My statement was with regards to most ISPs that I have experience with
> or or where we have had reports from others.
> 
> Your specific ISP was not necessarily included in that statement.=20
> Therefore, your single solitary counter-example does not necessarily
> disprove anything.
> 
> >  I can assure you that we do run our own NTP servers, and our customer
> 
> > routers are pre-configured with a Name not an IP address to get to
> them.
> >  We let our DNS servers sort out the load balancing issues (if we ever
> 
> > get any).
> 
> You're just one ISP.  You do not comprise the whole of all ISPs on the
> planet.
> 
> >  It's working fine, and several hundred-thousand clients can't be
> wrong!
> 
> And I personally worked at AOL (tens of millions of customers) and the
> largest ISP in Belgium (over a million customers), and I've consulted at
> other ISPs around the world.  We've also had reports regarding a number
> of other ISPs around the world.
> 
> Your one counter example does not disprove our experience.
> 
> --
> Brad Knowles <brad@shub-internet.org>
> LinkedIn Profile: <http://tinyurl.com/y8kpxu>
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg