Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) OptionsforDHCPv6
Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org> Wed, 28 November 2007 09:36 UTC
Return-path: <dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxJLl-00036l-9k; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:36:57 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxJLj-00036a-K8 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:36:55 -0500
Received: from mx.isc.org ([2001:4f8:0:2::1c]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxJLj-0001x5-6q for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:36:55 -0500
Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:bb::5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "farside.isc.org", Issuer "ISC CA" (verified OK)) by mx.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA38114069 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:36:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Mark_Andrews@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost.isc.org [IPv6:::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "drugs.dv.isc.org", Issuer "ISC CA" (verified OK)) by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764ABE6056 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:36:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAS9Ulk7065582; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:30:56 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from marka@drugs.dv.isc.org)
Message-Id: <200711280930.lAS9Ulk7065582@drugs.dv.isc.org>
To: anthony.flavin@bt.com
From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
Subject: Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) OptionsforDHCPv6
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:13:12 -0000." <548EC156325C6340B2E85DF90CAE8586019A0008@E03MVB3-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:30:47 +1100
X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-)
X-Scan-Signature: f607d15ccc2bc4eaf3ade8ffa8af02a0
Cc: mayer@ntp.isc.org, mellon@fugue.com, ntpwg@lists.ntp.org, brad@shub-internet.org, dhcwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
They are not the only ISP that supplies time. Optus does and I'm pretty sure Telstra also does. My home box is sync'd to a Optus NTP server. Mark > Perhaps some other ISP's involved with the NTPWG would care to comment > on whether or not the poor practice of the past is still in place, or > being replaced with best practice (which is to install their own > servers, or reach an agreement for the use of somebody else's).=20 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brad Knowles [mailto:brad@shub-internet.org]=20 > Sent: 27 November 2007 18:42 > To: Flavin,AJ,Tony,DMJ R; brad@shub-internet.org; Mark_Andrews@isc.org > Cc: mayer@ntp.isc.org; ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; mellon@fugue.com; > rgayraud@cisco.com; dhcwg@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) > OptionsforDHCPv6 > > On 11/27/07, <anthony.flavin@bt.com> wrote: > > > Completely wrong. > > My statement was with regards to most ISPs that I have experience with > or or where we have had reports from others. > > Your specific ISP was not necessarily included in that statement.=20 > Therefore, your single solitary counter-example does not necessarily > disprove anything. > > > I can assure you that we do run our own NTP servers, and our customer > > > routers are pre-configured with a Name not an IP address to get to > them. > > We let our DNS servers sort out the load balancing issues (if we ever > > > get any). > > You're just one ISP. You do not comprise the whole of all ISPs on the > planet. > > > It's working fine, and several hundred-thousand clients can't be > wrong! > > And I personally worked at AOL (tens of millions of customers) and the > largest ISP in Belgium (over a million customers), and I've consulted at > other ISPs around the world. We've also had reports regarding a number > of other ISPs around the world. > > Your one counter example does not disprove our experience. > > -- > Brad Knowles <brad@shub-internet.org> > LinkedIn Profile: <http://tinyurl.com/y8kpxu> -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… Mark Andrews
- Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… TS Glassey
- RE: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… anthony.flavin
- Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… Hui Deng
- Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… Brian Utterback
- RE: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… anthony.flavin
- Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… Mark Andrews
- Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… Brad Knowles
- RE: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… Brad Knowles
- Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… Brad Knowles
- Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… Danny Mayer