Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-layer-addr-opt-01
perl-list <perl-list@network1.net> Mon, 20 August 2012 13:07 UTC
Return-Path: <dankney@network1.net>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABAAA21F84F8 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id twHRHAShlW2x for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zimbra.network1.net (zimbra.network1.net [74.115.181.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38DA21F84EC for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zimbra.network1.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.network1.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDBC4541102; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:07:42 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:07:42 -0400
From: perl-list <perl-list@network1.net>
To: Chuck Anderson <cra@WPI.EDU>
Message-ID: <214048976.131904.1345468062774.JavaMail.root@network1.net>
In-Reply-To: <20120819033513.GA21200@angus.ind.WPI.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_131903_490917250.1345468062773"
X-Originating-IP: [74.115.182.5]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.2.0_GA_2669 (ZimbraWebClient - GC21 (Mac)/7.2.0_GA_2669)
Cc: dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-layer-addr-opt-01
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:07:44 -0000
I also support this text change... ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chuck Anderson" <cra@WPI.EDU> > To: "Ted Lemon" <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> > Cc: "dhc WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org> > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 11:35:13 PM > Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: > draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-layer-addr-opt-01 > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:38:48PM +0000, Ted Lemon wrote: > > On Aug 16, 2012, at 2:21 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > "4. DHCPv6 Relay Agent Behavior > > > > DHCPv6 Relay agents which are directly connected to clients/hosts > > MAY > > include client link-layer address option in relayed DHCPv6 (RELAY- > > FORW) message. The DHCPv6 Relay agent behaviour can depend on > > configuration that decides whether Client Link-layer Address option > > needs to be processed and included. > > > > In Relay chaining scenarios, any other relay agent other than first > > hop DHCPv6 Relay agent or DHCPv6 LDRA [RFC6221] MUST not add this > > option." > > > > Could say: > > > > DHCPv6 Relay agents which receive messages originating from clients > > (for example Solicit and Request, but not, for example, Relay > > Forward or Advertise) MAY include the link-layer source address of > > the received message in relayed DHCPv6 Relay Forward messages. > > The DHCPv6 Relay agent behavior can depend on configuration that > > decides whether Client Link-layer Address option needs to be > > processed and included. > I agree that this text would be good to replace the existing text in > section 4. > > > > This makes it clear where the link layer address is coming from. As > > an added bonus, there's no need to mention LDRAs or intermediary > > relays, since Relay Forward messages are specifically excluded. > Agreed. > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > dhcwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… Ted Lemon
- [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-l… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… perl-list
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… A. Gregory Rabil
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… Chuck Anderson
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… perl-list
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… Chuck Anderson
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… A. Gregory Rabil
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… perl-list
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… A. Gregory Rabil
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… A. Gregory Rabil
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… perl-list
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… Chuck Anderson
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… perl-list
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… Tomek Mrugalski
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… Chuck Anderson
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… perl-list
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… Chuck Anderson
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… sthaug
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… Chuck Anderson
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… perl-list
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi)