Re: [dhcwg] Assigning DHCPv6 option codes
Ted Lemon <mellon@nominum.com> Wed, 23 January 2002 17:20 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA17078 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:20:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id MAA06310 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:20:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA06188; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:14:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA06166 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:14:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from toccata.fugue.com (toccata.fugue.com [204.152.186.142]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA16788 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:13:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from green.bisbee.fugue.com ([193.0.5.45]) by toccata.fugue.com (8.11.3/8.6.11) with ESMTP id g0NH8La24422; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 09:08:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dechen (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.bisbee.fugue.com (8.10.2/8.6.11) with ESMTP id g0NHA7001493; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 18:10:07 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 18:10:07 +0100
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Assigning DHCPv6 option codes
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v480)
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
To: "Bernie Volz (EUD)" <Bernie.Volz@am1.ericsson.se>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <66F66129A77AD411B76200508B65AC69B4CDF4@EAMBUNT705>
Message-Id: <0CD1ABF8-1024-11D6-AF3C-00039317663C@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
We shouldn't allow people to request option codes from the IANA if they haven't published a draft, but I think it's safe to relax the restrictions to the extent that if a draft exists, an option code can be assigned without the draft going to last call. This utterly draconian requirementis only justified by the extremely small number of option codes available in DHCPv4. _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] Assigning DHCPv6 option codes Ralph Droms
- RE: [dhcwg] Assigning DHCPv6 option codes Bernie Volz (EUD)
- RE: [dhcwg] Assigning DHCPv6 option codes Bernie Volz (EUD)
- Re: [dhcwg] Assigning DHCPv6 option codes Ted Lemon
- RE: [dhcwg] Assigning DHCPv6 option codes Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Assigning DHCPv6 option codes Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Assigning DHCPv6 option codes Vernon Schryver
- RE: [dhcwg] Assigning DHCPv6 option codes Bernie Volz (EUD)
- Re: [dhcwg] Assigning DHCPv6 option codes Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Assigning DHCPv6 option codes Ted Lemon
- RE: [dhcwg] Assigning DHCPv6 option codes Richard Barr Hibbs
- RE: [dhcwg] Assigning DHCPv6 option codes Richard Barr Hibbs
- RE: [dhcwg] Assigning DHCPv6 option codes Vernon Schryver
- RE: [dhcwg] Assigning DHCPv6 option codes Richard Barr Hibbs
- RE: [dhcwg] Assigning DHCPv6 option codes Vernon Schryver
- RE: [dhcwg] Assigning DHCPv6 option codes Ralph Droms