Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 - respond by August 8th
tianxiang li <peter416733@gmail.com> Fri, 29 July 2016 06:42 UTC
Return-Path: <peter416733@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2711912D0AF for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 23:42:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1VbIXk7qJN9a for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 23:42:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x232.google.com (mail-oi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69FD5124281 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 23:42:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x232.google.com with SMTP id w18so94507005oiw.3 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 23:42:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gsNtTnTnIL1CwOAiJClckX5LJcCRBXS6AskGcU48VlY=; b=fB8Mi0Lwuy+iyqUN4Rli+y3Lk9ZepiZ4LD3+6C17LkpvFPK52gmEtNiBHVo+mfWhvO DwScmTOzR1pexg9oACty0/AtubTDOGEm0GZCTJcG25jidJfilMF42U04Yv4lmWO4Imxu /g4MBEP0J7UWIS1ATkYhFfZiIQfYOxFC32i/g0oBaucvurBLI17eD0HKq407h/ClRYQF nz6UJN35EVJzvhWVqQl6ENwOoopWOsHMljFEwqhGVHmp6PdLFDRNmwp79uXnf6Dcau1W nYMHEcGBYvRP4yuSJp4SAEZJQIOstkIuh07ezGJbnp0AdqoGsSRfbL1KcwT+cQQgmoRm 3usA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gsNtTnTnIL1CwOAiJClckX5LJcCRBXS6AskGcU48VlY=; b=CR9Kiu81l0lWyoeHRU1GXg4YN+Rr0k0GA7T+9+6bMa4uBzUvtUQS666W7MVkriXb1W SaBZr37a/oeXfHxIjLfTGlnpJzdCEwV75JrBOQ7mKxEcvpu+pYRhB4UQbjOwrW/nSdr9 6R7H/++hnRTgvfVoN9BmSVyaaeQvj8/3aLhWCBlL7lGkjEV4mIHP4VvSo1rkUhEqJsZW 68rgzVq3H5iQfKXXsBzJbhLFr113lVFTMmhBGCtxjCejTvy22eLAQGBN0I60eOpubU69 Hb1C1ggLZUP/JKyQ7QKiCrh02k0Onb39MZY/TSZ+/P+SLvbZ7yYcscywvp4yvQ768apv +UYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvTC52EVqweijIh+Ggy6N9bj/xRgCgcQyVzNmhjVkkaylZgySdGNZAN+Dr6Hb/9EKQ1LwTrNCKj8CL6Gg==
X-Received: by 10.157.39.130 with SMTP id c2mr22865842otb.181.1469774524811; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 23:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.108.202 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 23:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <577FDCCE.5090107@gmail.com>
References: <577FDCCE.5090107@gmail.com>
From: tianxiang li <peter416733@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 14:41:25 +0800
Message-ID: <CAFx+hEPrtUDmCnp0MnSWRsDjMRffeoKdGS61=t7QcP7S3v-KhA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c04f8407392b70538c08c4f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/N1C_IDIyPgerNbJ6t3ZgPG1UPV4>
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 - respond by August 8th
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 06:42:07 -0000
A few quick comments below: Throughout the document, “IAPREFIX option” and “IA Prefix option” are both used (e.g. section 17.1.9.), should there be a unified expression? Currently, draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue uses the term “IAPREFIX option” should we change it to “IA Prefix option”? Some wording errors for Section 22 privacy considerations: "This section focuses on the server considerations. For extended discussion about privacy considerations for the client, see [RFC7824]. It(In) particular, Section 3 of said(the) document discuss(discusses) various identifiers that could be misused to track the client." Cheers, Tianxiang 2016-07-09 1:03 GMT+08:00 Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>: > Hi all, > > So the day finally has come. Authors working on RFC3315bis believe that > after over two years of work, this document is ready for working group > last call. This call initiates the working group last call on > draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 [1]. Since this is a large document (130+ > pages), there's upcoming meeting and a holiday period, chairs decided to > do an extended last call that will last 4 weeks. Please post your > comments by August 8th. > > We do have a slot reserved for this work in Berlin. We will present the > overview of the document (some areas are organized differently than > original 3315), go over the most important changes and will discuss any > comments raised to date. > > If you would like to review more important changes, looking at > appendices A anb B seems like a good place to start. If you like to see > the list of tickets addressed, see [2]. Many smaller issues were > discussed on dhcpv6bis mailing list [3]. > > This is the most important document the DHC working group is currently > working on. Please review it thoroughly. Since both co-chairs are also > co-authors, our shepherd, Ralph Droms, will determine consensus and wrap > up the WGLC. Thank you Ralph for stepping up and helping with this! > > 1. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 > 2. https://tools.ietf.org/group/dhcpv6bis/ > 3. https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcpv6bis > > Cheers, > Bernie & Tomek > > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > dhcwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg >
- [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 - re… Tomek Mrugalski
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 … 神明達哉
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 … 神明達哉
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 … Marcin Siodelski
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 … Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 … Ian Farrer
- Re: [dhcwg] DHCP Relay and Prefix Delegation Ian Farrer
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 … Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] YANG model for DHCPv6 - draft-ietf-dh… ian.farrer
- [dhcwg] DHCP Relay and Prefix Delegation Alexandre Petrescu
- [dhcwg] YANG model for DHCPv6 - draft-ietf-dhc-dh… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 … Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 … Marcin Siodelski
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 … Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 … tianxiang li
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 … 神明達哉
- Re: [dhcwg] DHCP Relay and Prefix Delegation Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] DHCP Relay and Prefix Delegation Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 … Ted Lemon