RE: [dhcwg] (no subject)
"Bernie Volz" <volz@cisco.com> Tue, 23 November 2004 14:59 UTC
Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA17269; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:59:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CWbuU-0003VC-Hk; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:44:50 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CWbqj-0001s8-Su for dhcwg@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:40:58 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA14884 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:40:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72] helo=sj-iport-3.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CWbuO-00019E-In for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:44:46 -0500
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (171.71.177.238) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Nov 2004 07:46:07 +0000
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Received: from flask.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@flask.cisco.com [161.44.122.62]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id iANEeK9j006298; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 06:40:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from volzw2k ([161.44.65.122]) by flask.cisco.com (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id ANF88685; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:40:18 -0500 (EST)
From: Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>
To: 'Theodore Vojnovich' <tbvojnov@us.ibm.com>, dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] (no subject)
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:40:17 -0500
Organization: Cisco
Message-ID: <001001c4d16a$59e73640$7a412ca1@amer.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4939.300
In-Reply-To: <OF6CB57CA3.26395593-ON85256F55.0012E88B-85256F55.0013D14C@us.ibm.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 32b73d73e8047ed17386f9799119ce43
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0447504365=="
Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
No, RFC 3942 only impacts the "main" DHCP option numbers, not sub-options inside of other options. So, if you're currently encoding suboptions in Option 43, you can continue to do that - Bernie -----Original Message----- From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Theodore Vojnovich Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 10:36 PM To: dhcwg@ietf.org Subject: [dhcwg] (no subject) Does rfc 3942 affect the usage of vendor specific options (vendor class identifier option 60 or client identifier option 61). Specifically, in the response to option 60 (option 43) still have "sub" options in the 200s...or....do we need to get some sort of IANA position on the use of vendor options inside 60/43? Thanks Ted Vojnovich Email: tbvojnov@us.ibm.com
_______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] (no subject) hu.yuxing
- [dhcwg] (no subject) Erik.nordmark
- [dhcwg] (no subject) Erik.nordmark
- [dhcwg] (no subject) Yi Chen
- Re: [dhcwg] (no subject) Ralph Droms
- [dhcwg] (no subject) Jorge Silva
- [dhcwg] (no subject) Gopi Krishna
- [dhcwg] (no subject) khamphanh savanh
- [dhcwg] (no subject) myyahoo
- [dhcwg] (no subject) Npprasad
- [dhcwg] (no subject) Bryan Lavigne
- [dhcwg] (no subject) J.A. Ribelles
- [dhcwg] (no subject) YiTing Liu
- [dhcwg] (no subject) yuan zhang
- [dhcwg] (no subject) CTO YAN Renxiang
- [dhcwg] RE: Client FQDN Bernie Volz
- Re: [dhcwg] RE: Client FQDN Ted Lemon
- [dhcwg] (no subject) Kuntal Chowdhury
- RE: [dhcwg] (no subject) Bernie Volz
- [dhcwg] (no subject) Theodore Vojnovich
- [dhcwg] (no subject) Ralph Droms
- [dhcwg] (no subject) peter_blatherwick
- [dhcwg] (no subject) Joseph
- [dhcwg] (no subject) Joseph
- [dhcwg] (no subject) Joseph
- Re: [dhcwg] (no subject) Ralph Droms
- [dhcwg] (no subject) A. Gregory Rabil
- Re: [dhcwg] (no subject) Andre Kostur
- Re: [dhcwg] (no subject) Bernie Volz (volz)