[dhcwg] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang-24: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 15 December 2021 15:55 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang@ietf.org, dhc-chairs@ietf.org, dhcwg@ietf.org, Timothy Winters <tim@qacafe.com>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <163958375258.20027.15240232088682885125@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 07:55:52 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/NsqZsZK_BzFhaBX-8ZGhsCrJKtM>
Subject: [dhcwg] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang-24: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang-24: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I suggest breaking Section 6 into two subsections, one for each batch of
registry operations.

A possibly ignorant question about YANG modules: Since RFCs 3319 and 8987 are
referenced from within the module itself, shouldn't they be normative
references?

[dhcwg] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-… Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
Re: [dhcwg] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on dr… mohamed.boucadair