Re: [dhcwg] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-mac-assign-06
"Ms. Li HUANG" <bleuoisou@gmail.com> Sat, 16 May 2020 08:33 UTC
Return-Path: <bleuoisou@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6AC43A0823; Sat, 16 May 2020 01:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l87peHx_RFLX; Sat, 16 May 2020 01:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2c.google.com (mail-io1-xd2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAAF03A00D9; Sat, 16 May 2020 01:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2c.google.com with SMTP id w25so5159312iol.12; Sat, 16 May 2020 01:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=c4uHmy7p7N6J8f/CV9Wt/UP6zjBtnlttmGUcaZ8LFwY=; b=DXT3X23kCcVwuV+W1E1UaKp1HIuZ67WHP7nGe/I9OcAyncQVoVM6W2kQWA+dPEL7N5 3cnYXVJilIBPAs1r4jcGlQ7J3zEsdpeDw9JBQJ96eIJOnR7fHjZ2p5CmdJoxjb7vcB8c DZRDP5mEw0M+ZSiPEE5ca5fODqnTOiUdTywFixcnBVzOx/5+a8wr4dZIdiQt83gwv+GK ZGE0yNqZXu/wsDh8iFzCp0rdyBE0hGnDQT7grn2kxNBJnvDDvZ2Mcdiz6dMKo8VrRAwG v15aQzoJI5nvJfNhS0xwRG0XP1B8+3oPWV6Lk09y/dpitZ1ef9t/O5+uIgz9viMm+CpL HnKA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=c4uHmy7p7N6J8f/CV9Wt/UP6zjBtnlttmGUcaZ8LFwY=; b=HM2mjbgg3xsY7SSqr6b5Dck2n7OOwCKc5jwKfRv7ux2DhAJGEIMsJk6WsTuvqKL//M E7R36LJKjSaqRIUVyZjULBCWDLSRI6hD09rNytLu9d7ruUal54gkaLY19tPTeyKiRuST J5I/cfC6XrobhaXTfJHeWEthSA69GL3vmUDPYWiy1pKaNH9ZyD8JZwk/1qoG7Zi8OqyM HSorsOWi76gXMaOaphLpT6QMTRQaBVaWkmY1gC7EwQmV9o4+ygcnMIiIq+fnZAaRg3Yy UHWCA9NUUyLjbyno09yKCqZTW3JZGbQ/lluN/FoNhuGl3Fd4/Thochz8Lr7biRM+fOx+ U/hg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531nfoYr6LKAlQctZK3jG97khDniBVNYDiUHa0OQ56Ejz8xy+5Rs v3d/UqgOW/uziGxqI2DlfBKPxhCKtdofEplVIdQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzED+VyxU5pLImF7SV4TWTmNL+IUSjZ/SwhNboST8GdxhWPq0aQyb009gmOCfAdH23MlVt9DqChDRcvCU58mjw=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:245:: with SMTP id 66mr5566516jau.69.1589618022680; Sat, 16 May 2020 01:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158926621972.24137.14737405711720351698@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <158926621972.24137.14737405711720351698@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: "Ms. Li HUANG" <bleuoisou@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 16:33:30 +0800
Message-ID: <CAGGiuEYoDX2h9G+Qni4_HrHK8vyeJinU3SExjz2AdQmRuQJmLQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dhc-mac-assign.all@ietf.org, dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000920cd605a5bfc952"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/NwNC77n5-J6FYlj3c2QAtz61tFQ>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-mac-assign-06
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 08:33:50 -0000
that is making sense to clients under isp, DNS, mail, dhcpv6 and, ... dhcpv4 ranges domains crazily being used widely , none a little tendency to stop at the may 2020 when ietf.org claimed THE IPV6 ONLY at the day, it is may 15 2020. would the IPv6.Only is auto, forced , willing way or else may please let know ? Sincerely Li HUANG On Tue, May 12, 2020, 14:50 Roni Even via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-dhc-mac-assign-?? > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review Date: 2020-05-11 > IETF LC End Date: 2020-05-19 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > The document is ready for publication as a standard track RFC with nits > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > Nits/editorial comments: > 1. In the terminology section I was wondering why the client is a device > while > the server is a software. Any reason for this distinction. > > 2. The server can allocate a smaller size chunk and not the requested > size. The > allocation policy is up to the server. Should it be required from the > server to > allocate the largest chunk that is closer to the requested size. > > > > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > dhcwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg >
- [dhcwg] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dhc… Roni Even via Datatracker
- Re: [dhcwg] Genart last call review of draft-ietf… Ms. Li HUANG
- Re: [dhcwg] Genart last call review of draft-ietf… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] Genart last call review of draft-ietf… Roni Even