[dhcwg] WG meeting follow-up - draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis (3/3)
"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Wed, 23 November 2016 19:44 UTC
Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D90129E50 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:44:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.018
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m6RDbm62jkXB for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:44:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B01E129E4A for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:44:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8371; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1479930276; x=1481139876; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=GHMS6UNpLhzZuSEXyPl2ZQ0df9c69yVfJ4ueolRoBA0=; b=bzrZqP8KoY6x4nZOTiJFB3F30lVlEUQA/sDWoi0uCB69yKc1kDhUrFx9 c3yokF5KKBvVhaRa/lGROjPSsCOZG6MxqOyamzDlwvczHPug6tAdnPKsQ 8kib1H2hpxmxbbFalaqzWQqUo2JzSYwD+wjLWAA1NR2BlNo+JQNl1kQN5 A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BvAQC28DVY/4gNJK1eGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgnNFAQEBAQEfWIECB405pm6FH4IHKogWPxQBAgEBAQEBAQFiHQuEbQItXgGBACYBBBuIZQ6eHJIli1UBAQEBAQEEAQEBAQEBHAWPTIV3BZpPAYZGijGBeoR3g0GGB5F1AR43gRQehSpyAYc3gQ0BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,539,1473120000"; d="scan'208,217";a="173165094"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 23 Nov 2016 19:44:35 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (xch-rcd-001.cisco.com [173.37.102.11]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uANJiZ1A012839 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 19:44:35 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 13:44:34 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 13:44:34 -0600
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG meeting follow-up - draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis (3/3)
Thread-Index: AdJFwfaEIshKNwoRRL6wGPK8hTkAfg==
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 19:44:34 +0000
Message-ID: <94fba5e167aa4806bcac4174581ee606@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.98.1.195]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_94fba5e167aa4806bcac4174581ee606XCHALN003ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/O4U73n4YnonWWHzkGbUT3bTY6a4>
Subject: [dhcwg] WG meeting follow-up - draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis (3/3)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 19:44:38 -0000
Hi: At IETF-97 (Seoul) I presented several issues that had been raised by reviewers during the WGLC of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05. The third was regarding IPsec Encryption Protocol (section 19.1 of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05). Here are the Etherpad notes taken by Tim Chown and others: - IPsec encryption protocol (136) Proposal: drop text in from draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-01 Only issue is that doc isn't done yet Action: will again confirm the proposed action on the list. Please read https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-01 (while technically the WGLC on this document was supposed to end on Nov 9th, Tomek has not yet issued the results of that WGLC (most likely it would not pass as there were no comments, other than from author, on this work). We would really like to use this text in draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis. In this case, the default action would be to leave it unspecified as to what encryption protocol to use, which likely will cause an issue during AD review, IETF LC, or IESG review on draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis. See slide #6 at https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides-97-dhc-dhcpv6bis-open-issues-discussion-01.pdf. - Bernie (for the bis team)
- [dhcwg] WG meeting follow-up - draft-ietf-dhc-rfc… Bernie Volz (volz)