Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-layer-addr-opt
Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Fri, 21 September 2012 14:21 UTC
Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3E221F884E for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 07:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PQ77DV3tjpjY for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 07:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC58821F8819 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 07:21:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost.ecs.soton.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8LELmIC000577 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:21:52 +0100
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk q8LELmIC000577
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=200903; t=1348237312; bh=PTPDIRRay/hJVqn2uksKeQmZtAI=; h=Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To; b=C96XUATkJv7SOpARXDeO/ekpcTcwhc3hetmnWx4m02cbchavB7fbjcyTWFe6EYWfW xb1BvVkCZUGGwaBqGGHst/HAQDu/3iDtyz/GAQv3wzWasWwEzLIxDYopU2ap9vI5mo F1YY86DmAzNPtKqjsbnRHZgujIzNDQsnKlfYm99I=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25d]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id o8KFLm0430631549dE ret-id none; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:21:52 +0100
Received: from ip-204-019.eduroam.soton.ac.uk (ip-204-019.eduroam.soton.ac.uk [152.78.204.19]) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8LELjvV007019 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:21:46 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1486\))
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <90903C21C73202418A48BFBE80AEE5EB1926098B@xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:21:45 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <EMEW3|6a1c01a28a1c05fe573a911b44d9b30co8KFLm03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|D23D07D9-01DC-4652-92C8-60FC24BFA9C0@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <BF22E1BC-0E6B-4245-95C4-95E8B0F210B0@nominum.com> <p062408a3cc821c8f69ad@simon.thehobsons.co.uk> <5A94443D-DF8E-4AA3-888B-96AC97E45D23@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|54cdd79b989cbc48ef75bbf93b6c9609o8KExs03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|5A94443D-DF8E-4AA3-888B-96AC97E45D23@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <90903C21C73202418A48BFBE80AEE5EB1926098B@xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com> <D23D07D9-01DC-4652-92C8-60FC24BFA9C0@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1486)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=o8KFLm043063154900; tid=o8KFLm0430631549dE; client=relay,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=1:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: q8LELmIC000577
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-layer-addr-opt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:21:59 -0000
OK, perhaps clarify that then.... "as it can obtain it directly from the L2 header of the received DHCP message" ? Tim On 21 Sep 2012, at 15:16, "Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi)" <ghalwasi@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Thanks for supporting the document. > > I think the first text which you referred is mentioned in the "Problem Statement" where in we really don't have a way to find out the link-layer address form the "DHCPv6 message header/options." > > Whereas the next text (section 5) is talking about server extracting it from DHCPv6 message L2 header. Not from the DHCPv6 message/options. > > Please let me know if you still find it confusing. > > Thanks, > Gaurav > > -----Original Message----- > From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tim Chown > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 7:30 PM > To: dhc WG > Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-layer-addr-opt > > Hi, > > This also has my support. It would be something we would use in our deployment. > > A little nit though... > > The text says: > "Similarly DHCPv6 Relay or Server cannot glean client link-layer address from the contents of DHCPv6 message received." > > > and then later in Section 5 the text that's been added in the latest version says: > "This specification does not specify the mechanism for DHCPv6 Server to find out link-layer address of the directly connected clients as a DHCP option as it can obtain it directly from the received message." > > This seems a bit contradictory - should the first text say "Similarly DHCPv6 Relay or DHCPv6 Server receiving a relayed message cannot glean"...? > > Tim > > On 21 Sep 2012, at 14:31, Simon Hobson <linux@thehobsons.co.uk> wrote: > >> Looks good to me. Has my support. >> >> -- >> Simon Hobson >> >> Visit http://www.magpiesnestpublishing.co.uk/ for books by acclaimed >> author Gladys Hobson. Novels - poetry - short stories - ideal as >> Christmas stocking fillers. Some available as e-books. >> _______________________________________________ >> dhcwg mailing list >> dhcwg@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg > > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > dhcwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-l… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… perl-list
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… Simon Hobson
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… Chuck Anderson
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… David Farmer
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… Tim Chown
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi)
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… Tim Chown
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi)
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… Prashant Jhingran (pjhingra)
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… sthaug
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… Paul Ebersman
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-li… Ted Lemon