Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00 - Respond by Feb. 28
"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Mon, 03 March 2014 16:35 UTC
Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21EF61A00E4 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 08:35:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TnFI60MkJc_n for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 08:35:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C571A00BB for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 08:35:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1489; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1393864543; x=1395074143; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=23M8YcqWKsFOZxB7Ma0JyxuPzEiWqPwTCFUZGFKvf4A=; b=mAqPOitHlrmtwKSqRNFc2kM0Ql07WEZCR87XHMB0/taMDwPc1WDDcpOP IN2RqHQvQm7s494k2NCMgSYWEq6vvssl7A5q15gWQusLB2IzpzeOgCReW Jm0GUdoVvCdvgYOfK+Vg11s928RdeOLMKkKOEYNJZgzZ8G4FFZIgL0scd c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhYFAPOuFFOtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABagwaBBsBcgSIWdIIlAQEBAwE6PwULAgEIGB4QMiUCBA4Fh3EIzDsXjiYzB4MkgRQBA5g8kiuBb4E+
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,578,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="307723974"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Mar 2014 16:35:42 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com [173.36.12.81]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s23GZgKw030069 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 3 Mar 2014 16:35:42 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.98]) by xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com ([173.36.12.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 10:35:42 -0600
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "Kim Kinnear (kkinnear)" <kkinnear@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00 - Respond by Feb. 28
Thread-Index: AQHPNvlUdT5EmXdgSE+4gs6hpAMH4ZrPh4RKgABp4wD//53heg==
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 16:35:41 +0000
Message-ID: <4F053201-DE3F-4EF5-ACA4-221E0A87DB1B@cisco.com>
References: <52FA8A40.8020703@gmail.com> <9701A42A-6369-455F-BB1B-606C9B8B7521@gmx.com> <abe550dc.00000a14.000001c0@lew.perftech.com>, <0B2D5DBE-B3D3-4330-B2D6-00E8E29818C9@pt.net> <22A8DA03-3E03-4B14-98ED-7CF1BF92C08A@cisco.com>, <0AD323D7-1C89-455A-ACFE-34F999BA46E3@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <0AD323D7-1C89-455A-ACFE-34F999BA46E3@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/OCOBeJ6-hPyirAoyi0rn_boR5sQ
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "Kim Kinnear (kkinnear)" <kkinnear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00 - Respond by Feb. 28
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 16:35:47 -0000
I guess a separate draft would likely be best as otherwise it might not be noticed. The dhcpv6 active lq draft extends the dhcpv6 bulk lq, but in ways that likely only an active LQ implementation would need. The dhcpv4 active lq draft does NOT at present extend dhcpv4 bulk lq, because the support for those similar extensions was already in RFC 6926. BTW: all my comments on this thread were as a wg member/co-author, not as WG co-chair. - Bernie (from iPad) > On Mar 3, 2014, at 11:26 AM, "Kim Kinnear (kkinnear)" <kkinnear@cisco.com> wrote: > > > I think Lewis is saying that he thinks that it is worth extending the > v4 bulk leasequery draft at this time. I think he agrees that the > approach you are suggesting would be reasonable. > > I think his question is more: Where should this extension be documented? > > 1. The existing v4 bulk leasequery RFC with a new draft. > > 2. Add words to v4 active leasequery to extend the v4 bulk leasequery RFC, > and of course change the active leasequery status to "extends v4 bulk > leasequery". > > #1 is the obvious approach, but higher overhead than #2. > > Regards -- Kim > > >> On Mar 3, 2014, at 11:07 AM, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> wrote: >> >> Is it worth extending this for v4 at this time? Making it optional (client can request to only send "useful" stuff, server can ignore if it doesn't support) would be ok. >
- [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-lea… Tomek Mrugalski
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active… Kim Kinnear
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active… Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active… Ian Farrer
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active… Lewis Donzis
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active… Qi Sun
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active… Mathias Samuelson
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active… Lewis Donzis
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active… Kim Kinnear
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active… Bernie Volz (volz)
- [dhcwg] WGLC summary for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-ac… Tomek Mrugalski