IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [dhcwg] Internet Drafts to be reviewed by the dhc WG

"S. Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com> Thu, 01 April 2004 02:52 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA28229 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:52:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B8sJ9-0003OD-Ox for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:51:56 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i312pt1R013022 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:51:55 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B8sJ9-0003NG-JC for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:51:55 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA28169 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:51:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B8sJ6-0007B8-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:51:52 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B8sIC-00076X-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:50:57 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B8sHM-00070r-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:50:05 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B8sHJ-0002xI-AN; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:50:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B8sH9-0002wv-9d for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:49:51 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA28060 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:49:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B8sH6-0006zs-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:49:48 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B8sGA-0006x1-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:48:50 -0500
Received: from mailout1.samsung.com ([203.254.224.24]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B8sFN-0006rE-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:48:01 -0500
Received: from custom-daemon.mailout1.samsung.com by mailout1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) id <0HVH00901131QJ@mailout1.samsung.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 11:47:25 +0900 (KST)
Received: from ep_mmp2 (mailout1.samsung.com [203.254.224.24]) by mailout1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HVH005R5130OW@mailout1.samsung.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 11:47:24 +0900 (KST)
Received: from LocalHost ([168.219.202.103]) by mmp2.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) with ESMTPA id <0HVH00DX1130Q0@mmp2.samsung.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 11:47:24 +0900 (KST)
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 11:47:42 +0900
From: "S. Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com>
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] Internet Drafts to be reviewed by the dhc WG
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20040331210913.0262ad68@flask.cisco.com>
To: 'Ralph Droms' <rdroms@cisco.com>, dhcwg@ietf.org
Message-id: <005701c41793$b42dd370$67cadba8@LocalHost>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I second " YES"

I believe that kind of drafts (all DHCP Options) should be 
considered in the DHC WG, regarding technical aspect 
related WGs have to carefully review them of course.  

Regards

- Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
- Mobile Platform Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-admin@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Ralph Droms
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:12 AM
> To: dhcwg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Internet Drafts to be reviewed by the dhc WG
> 
> 
> OK - the *original* question was "Is there any objection to 
> taking on this
> review as a dhc WG work item, pending acceptance of the 
> documents by the
> midcom WG?"
> 
> Let me extend that question to ask for positive responses, as 
> well - please
> respond "yes" or "no" to the question "Should the dhc WG take 
> on review of
> draft-tran-midcom-dhcp-option-00.txt and
> draft-tran-midcom-dhcpv6-option-00.txt, pending acceptance of 
> the documents
> by the midcom WG?"
> 
> - Ralph
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status