IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00 - Respond by Feb. 28

"Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com> Thu, 27 February 2014 17:28 UTC

Return-Path: <shemant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677BF1A0136 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:28:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l-PaAUdXU534 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:28:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8893D1A00FB for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:28:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3065; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1393522132; x=1394731732; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=3Zhr2qaJnKhouszyfg5mhD9T+9w05gmV8IwAJv3CSrE=; b=C/5/yLAOTZ5RJn2oaWlQROjSqjmQIMNWHRFD1cer7eda3oXVs4W5b8EF 07au9jFbZ7eMzFa8YjJ9xWxJSiQ/QbKs5NS5t2l6HqQueaxtkLwUgOONn a5P1Sf+cmGVqt6p/au1z1Jvlv8PlVWBqrTJFKjH77LM0QamPyMbrGFDXV s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aj0FADN1D1OtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABagwY7SwzBC4EbFnSCJQEBAQMBAQEBNzQLBQcEAgEIEQQBAQsUCQcnCxQJCAIEAQ0FCIdpCA3KcRMEjiQxBwaDHYEUBJRNlhWBb4E+gio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,556,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="307058660"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2014 17:28:50 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com [173.37.183.76]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1RHSoKB016495 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:28:50 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.6.236]) by xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([173.37.183.76]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:28:49 -0600
From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
To: "Kim Kinnear (kkinnear)" <kkinnear@cisco.com>, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00 - Respond by Feb. 28
Thread-Index: AQHPM9KtaeFxIUaio0arvTlNKTNOI5rJWuOw
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:28:49 +0000
Message-ID: <75B6FA9F576969419E42BECB86CB1B8911600D58@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com>
References: <52FA8A40.8020703@gmail.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AEAB9BF@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <1CD2937E-5A0E-4BD9-AC15-51815EBE8DFB@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <1CD2937E-5A0E-4BD9-AC15-51815EBE8DFB@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.131.71.141]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/PU-6jZ0SgpYiZliU6wHi6e_KKp8
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00 - Respond by Feb. 28
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:28:55 -0000

I read the document and it looks good to move forward.  Thanks for putting together this document. 

Cheers,

Hemant

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kim Kinnear (kkinnear)
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 10:43 AM
To: Bernie Volz (volz)
Cc: dhcwg; Kim Kinnear (kkinnear)
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00 - Respond by Feb. 28


I wrote this draft, and believe that it should be moved forward.

I would sure appreciate some additional eyes on it if we elect to move it forward, as I'm sure there are things that we've missed.

Regards -- Kim

On Feb 24, 2014, at 2:42 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:

> Reminder that this WGLC is outstanding.
> 
> We need feedback in order to determine whether to advance this document.
> 
> - Bernie
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tomek 
> Mrugalski
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 3:38 PM
> To: dhcwg
> Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00 - 
> Respond by Feb. 28
> 
> We have adopted two active leasequery drafts after Vancouver meeting.
> There was moderate interest in that work during adoption call, but we never saw any discussions about them on the ML. Since authors confidence in those proposals are high due to existing implementations, they have requested WGLC.
> 
> After a quick discussion between chairs, we have decided to go ahead with the WGLC, hoping that it will trigger some reviews and discussion.
> Please make no mistake - those drafts need reviews and comments. A simple "I support this" followed with couple +1s will not do do the trick here.
> 
> This WGLC is for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00. Please send your comments by Feb. 28th. Note that although both documents are very similar, they are separate drafts and are going through separate WGLCs.
> If you support this work, make sure that you clearly state which draft (v4, v6 or both) you support. Each WGLC will be assessed independently.
> 
> Finally, I'd also remind you that we are looking for volunteers to do the shepherding work. Please let us know if you'd like to be a shepherd for one of those documents. It is not a difficult task, but some prior IETF experience is necessary. As a shepherd, you can get unique insight into the WGLC process and better exposure to how IESG works. Having such an experience can be useful with moving your own draft forward faster.
> 
> Bernie & Tomek
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email