Re: [dhcwg] DHCP Process Time
sthaug@nethelp.no Wed, 28 September 2016 08:37 UTC
Return-Path: <sthaug@nethelp.no>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA7F12B4D2 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 01:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.517
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q4VyH4kgRvhs for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 01:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9038B12B3F7 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 01:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 43059 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2016 08:29:02 -0000
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (HELO localhost) (195.1.209.33) by bizet.nethelp.no with SMTP; 28 Sep 2016 08:29:02 -0000
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 10:29:02 +0200
Message-Id: <20160928.102902.74709319.sthaug@nethelp.no>
To: Hans Christian Silaban <ybhanscs@gmail.com>
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: <CAMpwFvo-J1CMVvDK16L034dPquqBeKq=5LAMgw0ZNCrF8pQMzQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMpwFvo-J1CMVvDK16L034dPquqBeKq=5LAMgw0ZNCrF8pQMzQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/PwlZXxIOSQ7zGaXw636tI20PKZw>
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DHCP Process Time
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:37:54 -0000
> I'm doing a research about DHCP option. I wan't to analyze the DHCP process > time before and after implement the option. Is there any standard that for > the DHCP process time? I mean from the DHCP DISCOVER until DHCP ACK. Thank > you. As far as I know there is no standard for DHCP process time. Also, I'm not sure how relevant it is: I would expect the additional processing time for one extra DHCP option to be barely measurable. The *server* is probably going to spend more time doing disk writes and logging. Steinar Haug, AS 2116
- [dhcwg] DHCP Process Time Hans Christian Silaban
- Re: [dhcwg] DHCP Process Time Karl Auer
- Re: [dhcwg] DHCP Process Time Simon Hobson
- Re: [dhcwg] DHCP Process Time Karl Auer
- Re: [dhcwg] DHCP Process Time sthaug