IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] preliminary comments on draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-17

JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com> Mon, 07 November 2016 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259E512956F for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 09:56:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.019
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pCurJAn_7jRG for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 09:56:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.64.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6A811296EC for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 09:56:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A6E03497D6; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 17:56:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3C4D160044; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 17:56:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48A8160074; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 17:56:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 7Hkp85kBOTA1; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 17:56:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from jmb.localhost (c-50-156-82-172.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.156.82.172]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB2A2160044; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 17:56:05 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 09:56:05 -0800
Message-ID: <m2pom7uqbu.wl%jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
From: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
To: Lishan Li <lilishan48@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ3w4NdwqcqQrdB1RM5-zk-gJEYqLP0OtT-qQ8zTO03WXUt8ng@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJE_bqebwr2WUUgaNgiYS4_8L77Gxj4Os+oPRG407B6ELMEhCQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ3w4Ndi5Gq63n5kZnanRhLM8nWE2wsWGh0kJJLJnq=VoXLuCg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqegh1DfWjfK2BxeC_fWa0cEk-KJNP0AT-TQuEa39w_wVQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ3w4NdM99nv4C19Xj=aosNme+_Ymyys=xQ3UWUfeZReZC4ckA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqdhGZnK16MooiyujDgthDNnR74EiwW0OevrN6uq4b4ANw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqfKUZe2yaW1sAq7rrib0M7wz28HHtPLqCHK=vXcN6amgg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ3w4Nd3MB23_XB1jTV21kwUz7Bj4pwKO-zn_skw_4Onk7+2mQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ3w4NdwqcqQrdB1RM5-zk-gJEYqLP0OtT-qQ8zTO03WXUt8ng@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/Q4DdoZtdvWwaHhFI_P-erUDpagQ>
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] preliminary comments on draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-17
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 17:56:09 -0000

At Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:43:40 +0800,
Lishan Li <lilishan48@gmail.com> wrote:

> If the Information-request message indicates the algorithms, then we need
> to make the following update:
> 1. The Information-request message contains the new define algorithm
> option, which contains the EA-id List, HA-id List, SA-id List;

Yes.

> 2. The Certificate option contains the EA-id field, not EA-id List. And
> signature option contains the SA-id field and HA-id field, not SA-id List
> and HA-id List.

For the certificate, see my other message.  For the signature, yes.

--
JINMEI, Tatuya

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email