[dhcwg] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-07: (with COMMENT)
Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Mon, 13 November 2017 03:47 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88FAB129407; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:47:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port@ietf.org, Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>, dhc-chairs@ietf.org, tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com, dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.65.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151054482655.21370.2657580358462340178.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 19:47:06 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/Q5u7MQqGSf3MwqU9j7wNZ7uW7hs>
Subject: [dhcwg] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 03:47:07 -0000
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-07: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I really think this document should update RFC2131 and RFC3315 as it proposed concrete changes to both RFCs. The point is that, while the use of the described mechanism and options is optional, I think the updates of the texts apply more generally. Further, I would think that if a DHCP server now has to listen on all ports for incoming traffic, that this would raise additional security considerations. However, didn’t think enough about it to name a specific threat.
- [dhcwg] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-i… Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [dhcwg] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dra… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dra… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
- Re: [dhcwg] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dra… Suresh Krishnan