IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] New Version Notification for draft-sarikaya-nvo3-dhc-vxlan-multicast-00.txt

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Wed, 19 February 2014 20:16 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B051A022E for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:16:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cJC3eBnlHZRQ for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:16:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x230.google.com (mail-lb0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935F31A0167 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:16:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id w7so663017lbi.7 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:16:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jrfvJOdzWGOaDg2pnE2wlFXCo1TEt3ib33KVN76b9Wg=; b=kBy6zO94YKnkLftI3Nbhiuv2iTkjLOJ72oBD0rRmTtPB82ikHgMRJ8lx8k16Igy+zV ULR9q3Mrt14FYos3rv92nXofsN5dgqrttQivsuV6fz7ln5el+0P7qyu31DRd6kuzFOeh LJdcPGRcIACRH74+Ogjzup75KXvXgEA+UGyJZTU8r3VIT7bWwojCJeT8JvDscweNvEKX wnmI5WrW+x7gHq7jfwO5IvgkvM2oXdjpkbWzghTtnEtfG5oT1Cy/gFCbfMygA2wwDd5Z SGoTag9KrCr0sx/HhqFo8CgZLvbgeeLBV+WWEVP6WGsODqIbESZswJ7Wf4505OmIphmG 8tsA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.164.199 with SMTP id ys7mr27496504lab.31.1392840968422; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:16:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.170.195 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:16:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2D6D46E6-15C5-4465-843B-3FECA8DC729D@nominum.com>
References: <20140214173114.23812.70162.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAC8QAcfGgayrUkXZp4hNdGeZpfv3hazpg4n=2kx8qUHqObhUAg@mail.gmail.com> <2D6D46E6-15C5-4465-843B-3FECA8DC729D@nominum.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:16:08 -0600
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcfQSR8KGjA1u-Y2LOOoqvAFMTP43PqmUjXXe+nMD2B9qQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1134962626cae704f2c80fd8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/Q7MgKDDQ4ApYCLyBC4tbGInpqzw
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Dhc Chairs <dhc-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] New Version Notification for draft-sarikaya-nvo3-dhc-vxlan-multicast-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 20:16:14 -0000

Hi Ted,

Apologies for my very belated reply. Just now I saw your message. Thanks
for reminding it.

Please see inline.

Regards,

Behcet


On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> On Feb 14, 2014, at 12:36 PM, Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > New DHCP options
> >    are defined which allow a VXLAN Tunnel End Point to request any
> >    source multicast address for the newly created virtual machine and
> >    possibly IPv4/IPv6 address(es) for the virtual machine.
>
> This sounds like another set of stateful DHCP options.   Why not just use
> regular DHCP IA_NA or IA_PD?
>
>
For IA_NA, are you suggesting to use this option to get multicast addresses?
I think that IA_NA is defined for unicast addresses.


The other option we need is for VXLAN Network Identifier (VNI) which is
certainly not an address.

For IA_PD, I believe also is not appropriate to request multicast address
to be assigned, as it is not related to prefix delegation.

Please advise.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email