Re: [dhcwg] AD Evaluation: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 03 February 2014 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D641A00FC for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 07:38:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZJfkFcbg-89Q for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 07:38:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og108.obsmtp.com (exprod7og108.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6F11A0032 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 07:38:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob108.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUu+33zINt8zQuUX8UIt4NSIFrMkH1XXO@postini.com; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 07:38:08 PST
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A241B8305 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 07:38:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC3C190052; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 07:38:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.10.40] (192.168.1.10) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 07:38:07 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA3A730C-A2A9-42F2-A94C-E44747E0C87B@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 10:38:04 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <AC1BEE6C-9C9D-431F-A180-630052B34A90@nominum.com>
References: <52EBC3EA.1020104@innovationslab.net> <CFA19E62-0F9A-4358-AB7C-E4A910BF4874@nominum.com> <52EFA4E8.2040404@innovationslab.net> <D4ECE269-E79C-41A7-9AD1-82E04AB02432@nominum.com> <52EFAD21.6040901@innovationslab.net> <CA3A730C-A2A9-42F2-A94C-E44747E0C87B@gmail.com>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] AD Evaluation: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 15:38:09 -0000

On Feb 3, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have a less laissez-faire view, here, which is that we ought to disallow explicitly the deployment of a client and relay agent on the same device, with a recommendation that a specification for such a deployment needs to be written if the use case is realized.

That sounds like the opposite of a laissez-faire view.   The only problem with this proposal is that there's no reason to think that anyone who needs to would read it.   This sounds like more of a thing to do in 3315bis.