Re: [dhcwg] We can change the world in a 1000 ways (IPv4 over IPv6)

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 15 November 2013 19:12 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4321A11E812F for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:12:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.274
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.274 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.325, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U2mJuxfTlLWN for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:12:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og128.obsmtp.com (exprod7og128.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.121]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC5F11E80F7 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:12:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob128.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUoZyDsdLpre5U9HJfHy7JAd1oTMCNUaa@postini.com; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:12:14 PST
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44BD1B826F for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:12:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AE89190043; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:12:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.131]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:12:13 -0800
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Simon Hobson <dhcp1@thehobsons.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] We can change the world in a 1000 ways (IPv4 over IPv6)
Thread-Index: AQHO4gqM1lCZcft8K0C2M4xcE85DdJonLzKA
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:12:12 +0000
Message-ID: <92B2C068-0B49-4C36-A747-C467B151D53B@nominum.com>
References: <01F5C7CDD919BC53DB9D7A4F661382@thehobsons.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <01F5C7CDD919BC53DB9D7A4F661382@thehobsons.co.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <7488ECED4A4341448FC6A38FE463173C@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] We can change the world in a 1000 ways (IPv4 over IPv6)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:12:21 -0000

On Nov 15, 2013, at 8:56 AM, Simon Hobson <dhcp1@thehobsons.co.uk> wrote:
> I suspect he may be referring to the way many ISPs treat IPv4 addresses as something they can charge for. For example, one of the big ISPs over here (BT Internet) charge (IIRC) £5 (so around $7 to $8)/month if you want a fixed address - which can be 25% or more extra on the monthly cost (depending on the package you buy). They aren't alone.
> But people pay it because they believe the ISP tale of how the adresses are in short supply blah, blah.
> 
> It's hard to sell the scarcity value of IPv6 addresses !

ISPs could do the same thing with IPv6 prefixes, and actually IPv6 renumbering means it would have a less painful impact on the customer (if done right, of course!).   I've never had anybody sell it on the basis of scarcity—it's always just been straight extortion: pay us for a stable address, or we may at any time renumber you.