IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Results of WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-03

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Tue, 11 February 2014 21:56 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA91D1A0787 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:56:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.049
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.049 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t9FOmMsrdpvn for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:56:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5BE61A0782 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:56:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2436; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1392155761; x=1393365361; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=K9+P1vFXM1/+ABGcDqPdV0tainVNFiP/R/SqkWFtcgo=; b=H8PHn913fecVAMUsyGhMEw7jjT5Zf7eTLrQinLh5tsQIwxhgJNoYkBc1 HoIHYpdM8EEch5bHRVwRcmnaz/TZyJRb+4839vaQTAZANKTYEQBPfbW9R Zn8akRiR1W67HaErwO+miEO2Y4EB1X1XjOnWba2LlaTycgow+TyeH6rvL s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah4FAMub+lKtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABagww4V78NgRcWdIIlAQEBBAEBAWsXBAIBCBEEAQEBCh0HJwsUCQgBAQQTCId9DclfEwSOSDgGgx6BFASJEKE6gy2CKg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,827,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="19685527"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2014 21:56:01 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com [173.37.183.85]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1BLu1un010956 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:56:01 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.213]) by xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com ([173.37.183.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:56:01 -0600
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Results of WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-03
Thread-Index: Ac8RbvjnR7wHzR7iTQy6lhZdhZEp8gWBDePw
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:56:00 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AE64F11@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AE1EEB5@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AE1EEB5@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [161.44.65.109]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Results of WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-03
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:56:04 -0000

This document did pass the WGLC but we had been waiting for the v4configuration draft, which has passed.

I believe (though need to confirm with the authors) that the 04 draft they published on Jan 17, 2014 incorporates all of the comments from the last call.

We will shortly send this off to advance (we expect to send this and the v4configuration draft about the same time).

- Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 4:26 PM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Results of WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-03

Hi:

We've left this WGLC open pending the last call on the v4configuration draft. The authors of the v4configuration draft have been working on updating it and should be submitting it shortly, at which time we will start the WGLC for it. We will then close the last calls for both documents (dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6 and v4configuration) at the same time.

Sorry for the delay but as the two documents are closely related, we feel it is best to hold off until both can be reviewed.

- Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tomek Mrugalski
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 9:58 AM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Results of WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-03 - Respond by Dec 9, 2013

On 16.12.2013 15:40, Simon Perreault wrote:
> Le 2013-12-14 10:10, Bernie Volz (volz) a écrit :
>> WGLC on the related draft-ietf-dhc-v4configuration-03 is in progress
> 
> Is this true? I can't find the announcement, and the datatracker 
> doesn't show the draft as being in WGLC...
No, that was a mistake. Bernie and I exchanged preliminary WGLC announcement text, but due to the discussion about dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6 we still haven't sent it out. So no - there is no WGLC on v4configuration yet, but there likely will be in the next couple days.
It will be long enough so people who take holiday + new year vacation will be able to get back and post their comments when they get back in January.

Tomek

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email