Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03

I have read this draft, and also support it moving forward.

As it happens, I'm in the same boat at Tomek -- I'm the other
co-author.

Please, read this draft and comment on whether or not you believe
it should move forward or not!

Thanks -- Kim

On Jul 26, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Tomek Mrugalski wrote:

> On 19.07.2013 15:59, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
>> Folks, the authors of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03
>> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design)
>> believe it is ready for working group last call. Please review this
>> draft and indicate whether or not you feel it is ready to be published.
>> Your input is important!
> I support this work moving forward. It doesn't count much, as I'm co-author.
> 
> I'm somewhat disappointed with the complete lack of any comments. When
> we started the work on v6 failover, there was exactly 20 people
> expressing their interest in this work that wanted to join the the
> effort. A year and a half passed and now there seems to be noone to even
> say "yeah, it's ok".
> 
> A week has passed for this WGLC already. WGLC will end in 2 weeks, so
> there's still plenty of time for a through review. If you want to have
> v6 failover, respond. Make no mistake - without sufficient support, this
> work will fail WGLC.
> 
> If you have time - please review it. If you are busy or just don't care
> about the details, saying that you support this work is useful and you
> want it to move forward is helpful, too.
> 
> Tomek
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 - Respond by August 9, 2013!