[dhcwg] New Version Notification for draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-02.txt

Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com> Wed, 04 December 2013 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <kkinnear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A565C1AE2B9 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 08:24:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0X7FW1N1u8Nv for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 08:24:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDE11AE105 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 08:24:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2887; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1386174272; x=1387383872; h=mime-version:subject:from:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+NGcp/wrG0ML1+WvGMjrrK/QlZcT7u39CLir7+axz+Q=; b=WDlSehgq37FA8nsPgWffv4dhHwa3e6F8JUVLPtbDxFkpUsgosUYDj66T QI7InQfX4e/xvnLxToXVRBsyBTBfeIvsZmyTOs8pSBAezpm0XSWLXOU+0 cEqkRMe5HnnYDann4Nr7x8A87xwADkuL6vI3UHaNm/TLeOC6gfej5qw0V A=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,825,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="4287222"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2013 16:24:32 +0000
Received: from [10.131.32.164] ([10.131.32.164]) (authenticated bits=0) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rB4GOVJn009348 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Dec 2013 16:24:32 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 11:24:30 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D5A32E2B-CAA1-4ECB-AA86-7CD567738A62@cisco.com>
References: <20131204150103.9960.74169.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-Authenticated-User: kkinnear
Cc: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com>
Subject: [dhcwg] New Version Notification for draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 16:24:37 -0000

Folks,

During the adoption discussion about DHCPv6 Active Leasequery there
was some discussion about having a corresponding DHCPv4 Active
Leasequery capability.  If there is sufficient interest in a DHCPv4
Active Leasequery capability to parallel the DHCPv6 capability that
was adopted as a DHC WG work item recently, then we can decide whether
or not we want to have two drafts moving toward two RFC's, or combine
them into one draft.

But the first question is whether or not there is sufficient interest
in having a DHCPv4 Active Leasequery capability at all!

In order to help decide this question, I have updated the existing
DHCPv4 Active Leasequery draft from a couple of years ago, and
resubmitted it as an individual submission -- as recommended by Bernie
and Tomek.

Below you can find the information on how to find this new draft.

Regards -- Kim


Begin forwarded message:

> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-02.txt
> Date: December 4, 2013 10:01:03 AM EST
> To: Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>, Mark Stapp <mjs@cisco.com>, Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com>, Neil Russell <neil.e.russell@gmail.com>
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-02.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Kim Kinnear and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Filename:	 draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery
> Revision:	 02
> Title:		 Active DHCPv4 Lease Query
> Creation date:	 2013-12-04
> Group:		 Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 22
> URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-02.txt
> Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery
> Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-02
> Diff:            http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-02
> 
> Abstract:
>   The Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv4 (DHCPv4) has been
>   extended with a Leasequery capability that allows a client to request
>   information about DHCPv4 bindings.  That mechanism is limited to
>   queries for individual bindings.  In some situations individual
>   binding queries may not be efficient, or even possible.  In addition,
>   continuous update of an external client with Leasequery data is
>   sometimes desired. This document expands on the DHCPv4 Leasequery
>   protocol, and allows for active transfer of near real-time DHCPv4
>   address binding information data via TCP.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
>