Re: [dhcwg] DHC WG charter

Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> Thu, 24 October 2002 18:43 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA19274 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:43:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g9OIjZF03466 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:45:35 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9OIjZv03463 for <dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:45:35 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA19266 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:43:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9OIgNv03404; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:42:23 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9OIeZv03373 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:40:35 -0400
Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA19135 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:38:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from westrelay03.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.194.24]) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g9OIceol053664; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:38:40 -0400
Received: from rotala.raleigh.ibm.com (rotala.raleigh.ibm.com [9.27.12.14]) by westrelay03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.3/NCO/VER6.4) with ESMTP id g9OIbOgM213074; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:37:24 -0600
Received: from rotala.raleigh.ibm.com (narten@localhost) by rotala.raleigh.ibm.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9OIYWh19187; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:34:32 -0400
Message-Id: <200210241834.g9OIYWh19187@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DHC WG charter
In-Reply-To: Message from Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com> of "Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:15:18 EDT." <4.3.2.7.2.20021023161441.03ecb358@funnel.cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:34:32 -0400
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

> The posted charter has been revised based on Bernie's input...

Looks pretty good overall.

But one thing seems odd:

> Complete or terminate work on DHCP ...

And then lists all the relevant WG drafts.

I think everyone will agree that the majority of the listed IDs stay
as WG items. Maybe a small number should be terminated?

We should have the discussion now about which documents are in and
which are no longer needed/appropriate. After all, the (re)chartering
process is about aligning the charter with the work being done.

There may be cases where there is a specific document that we don't
really know today what to do with it, that's OK, so long as it is
clear in the milestone (or charter) that the first order of business
is to figure out what to do with it (i.e., before additional work is
done on it).

But I don't think the charter should leave it so open ended as to
which IDs may or may not be kept.

Thomas


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg