Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-yeh-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt

"Leaf Y. Yeh" <leaf.y.yeh@huawei.com> Fri, 19 November 2010 13:17 UTC

Return-Path: <leaf.y.yeh@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7859C28C0F1 for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 05:17:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vZCdL3B9VxQG for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 05:17:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.66]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4B528C0F0 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 05:17:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LC4006X0VM1UO@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:18:01 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LC400HKGVM17A@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:18:01 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lst9242355d22a ([113.116.105.233]) by szxml01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0LC400CEPVM0JW@szxml01-in.huawei.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:18:01 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:18:03 +0800
From: "Leaf Y. Yeh" <leaf.y.yeh@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <4CE64E4B.3030004@cisco.com>
To: 'Eliot Lear' <lear@cisco.com>
Message-id: <015f01cb87ec$33197890$994c69b0$%y.yeh@huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-language: zh-cn
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Thread-index: AcuH0rY1f4nLN/DORJ+ATLSC3z2kbQAFalYw
References: <BC2DA9BF-7814-4505-8AEA-7513094490AC@nominum.com> <4CE64047.6010605@cisco.com> <B1C35A1D-F333-4906-BFC1-D77D91383462@nominum.com> <4CE64E4B.3030004@cisco.com>
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-yeh-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 13:17:23 -0000

Hi, Eliot

Eliot- And so I don't know what I'm voting to adopt.

What we are discussing here is supposed to be the draft on the IETF web page
(http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yeh-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt/ ).
You could refer to the presentation
(http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/slides/dhc-3.pdf ) in DHC session of
IETF79 for the detail description about the draft.

As Ted said in the mailing list the day before yesterday, " You don't have
to agree that the draft is complete as written--just that the working group
should be doing the work the draft is trying to do."

Am I clear now?

My Best Regards,

Leaf


-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Eliot Lear
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 6:16 PM
To: Ted Lemon
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org WG
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-yeh-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt



On 11/19/10 10:29 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> So you're against adopting a draft as a working group work item because it
needs to have work done on it?   Can you walk me through your reasoning in a
bit more detail?
>
>
The author just said they're redo-ing the doc in a rather vague way. 
And so I don't know what I'm voting to adopt.
_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg