IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Some comments regarding draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-01

Marcin Siodelski <msiodelski@gmail.com> Mon, 29 July 2013 11:18 UTC

Return-Path: <msiodelski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188C021F9AE9 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 04:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2jpy3eOFGu0D for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 04:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x22b.google.com (mail-la0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B34E21F9B60 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 04:18:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id fs13so4003627lab.30 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 04:18:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=RNkxMQ7FJ4jGWoFJQTsGcV/4OQDAQv7UFN8VnoytLPw=; b=F8dl+rmy/xcYSJAJa/wOYE3IbZnd6HJRVckVuQ+Toi5uGMoB0ag23nKnuKhlsQ78/t gtpAt56Fzfm5Mbv8Zwm4S4t0HLGlTiZAKuqiqtwmwQ3CkoJD2SBb9p0CaZS/jdlfH8iI x/WyreML6hcE5KSOxJMr7VxYS6v7TrDeASFaaLZj/qiV1W+8xQes+A3F7kw1LDvsS37Z xupiV4yw8VgaB7age5U0/SJHffGrVLhG8TdSs8QfKX7iQvOGSWOKX+ScrJBXQhmhTNV1 Ott1o8DM6cCf8wWaisLN63MBlBN6iaRNdihSuYFpbNN4yJKd4Ig+rwpR9oGBmsEVTPmL CpLw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.29.103 with SMTP id j7mr3600128lah.7.1375096710935; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 04:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.202.170 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 04:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <A62A9726-FD37-4715-9073-480187798603@gmail.com>
References: <CAFGoqUPOVNOknZFD7JkhOSDqu63VML6iH7yyuA-je-_8W=G2bQ@mail.gmail.com> <A62A9726-FD37-4715-9073-480187798603@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 13:18:30 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFGoqUO_MVVX+GF9__hTgv8OtxZLgLKasF8L9actr7fVnNXaYg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Marcin Siodelski <msiodelski@gmail.com>
To: Qi Sun <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0160b828fcb97704e2a4a62d"
Cc: "<dhcwg@ietf.org>" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "<cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>" <cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Some comments regarding draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-01
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:18:41 -0000

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Qi Sun <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com> wrote:

> How about the following text:
>
> "... the message is valid for constructing a new Relay-forward message if
> a relay agent receives the message, but the relay agent does not identify
> itself as the target of the message, and the message is not a Relay-Reply
> message."
>
> Is the usage of 'target' here is precise?
>
> Yes. It sounds much clearer now.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email