Re: [dhcwg] Incorporation of WG last call comments in draft-aboba-dhc-domsearch-06.txt

Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com> Wed, 26 September 2001 19:05 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA26573; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:05:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA12113; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:03:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA12087 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:03:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from internaut.com ([64.38.134.99]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA26456 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:03:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (aboba@localhost) by internaut.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA26163; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 11:55:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from aboba@internaut.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 11:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
To: Thomas Narten <narten@raleigh.ibm.com>
cc: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>, dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Incorporation of WG last call comments in draft-aboba-dhc-domsearch-06.txt
In-Reply-To: <200109261840.OAA16579@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0109261153490.26116-100000@internaut.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org

> > >Not sure the reference is normative. This option can use the long option
> > >encoding if available, but doesn't require it.
> 
> > Agreed; in fact, I think you could eliminate references to
> > the long option encoding draft w/o harming your spec...
> 
> This make sense to me. I will note, however, that current wording in
> the concat draft could be interpret to suggest that it's intended for
> future options and maybe less so for existing options. If the intent
> is in fact that it the concat draft should apply to *all* DHCP
> options, then taking out the reference would be fine.
> 
> If that is the intent, I'll go ahead and start the IETF last call on
> domsearch.

I had thought that concat would apply to all DHCP options that could
potentially run over the current limit. 


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg