Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6
Jitesh N Verma <jitesh@india.hp.com> Wed, 23 January 2002 06:56 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA23717 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 01:56:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id BAA10749 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 01:56:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA10579; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 01:42:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA10555 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 01:42:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from palrel10.hp.com (palrel10.hp.com [156.153.255.245]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA23541 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 01:42:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from chitha.india.hp.com (chitha.india.hp.com [15.10.43.31]) by palrel10.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8404C0018E; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 22:41:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from jitesh@localhost) by chitha.india.hp.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_17190)/8.8.6 SMKit7.02) id LAA15347; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:55:35 +0530 (IST)
From: Jitesh N Verma <jitesh@india.hp.com>
Message-Id: <200201230625.LAA15347@chitha.india.hp.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6
To: mjs@cisco.com
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:55:34 +0530
Cc: rdroms@cisco.com, dhcwg@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20020122152250.025e3638@goblet.cisco.com> from Mark Stapp at Jan "22, " 2002 "03:26:13" pm
X-Mailer: ELM [$Revision: 1.17.214.2 $]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi List, I strongly agree with Mark. Booting mechanism belongs to DHCP domain. Regards, Jitesh > I think that this proposal makes a great deal of sense. I do think that the > boot-file and tftp server address(es) options need to be added to the core > list: they really are 'core' to the boot process. > > -- Mark > > At 02:55 PM 1/22/2002 -0500, Ralph Droms wrote: > >We've recently experienced a proliferation of proposed and defined options > >for DHCPv6. Initially, the WG agreed to publish all options that were > >defined at the time the base spec was completed in the same doc. I'm > >having second thoughts about that decision. Here's what I'm thinking: > > > >* The new options are adding more weight to > > an already hefty document > >* Keeping all the options in one doc make > > updating any one option more complicated > >* Reviewing all of these options will slow > > down the acceptance process > > > >I propose that we put a moratorium on adding any new options to > >draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-22.txt, and move any non-essential options out of > >draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-22.txt into individual drafts. The definition of > >"essential" is open to discussion; here's a first pass at a list of the > >options to retain in draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-22.txt: > > > >* DHCP unique identifier option > >* Identity association option > >* IA Address option > >* Requested Temporary Addresses (RTA) Option > >* Option request option > >* Preference option > >* Elapsed Time > >* Client message option > >* Server message option > >* Authentication option > >* Server unicast option > >* Domain Search Option > >* Domain Name Server Option > >* Status Code Option > > > >- Ralph > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >dhcwg mailing list > >dhcwg@ietf.org > >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg > > > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > dhcwg@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg > -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ~ ~ *~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~* ^ Jitesh N. Verma Tel. 91-80-225 1554 Ext. 1424 ^ ^ HEWLETT PACKARD Fax. 91-80-220 0196 ^ ^ INDIA SOFTWARE OPERATIONS Email. jitesh@india.hp.com ^ ^ 29, CUNNINGHAM ROAD Pager. 9624-263608 ^ ^ BANGALORE 560 052 __ Telnet. 847-1424 ^ ^ / / ^ ^ / /___ _____ ^ ^ / __ // __ / ^ ^ / / / // /_/ / ^ ^ /_/ /_// ____/ ^ ^ / / ^ ^ /_/ ^ *~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~* _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Mark Stapp
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Jim Bound
- RE: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Bernie Volz (EUD)
- RE: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Jim Bound
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Jitesh N Verma
- RE: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Bernie Volz (EUD)
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Vijay Bhaskar A K
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Ted Lemon
- RE: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Jim Bound
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Vijay Bhaskar A K
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 John Schnizlein
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Jim Bound
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Ted Lemon
- RE: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Richard Barr Hibbs
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Jitesh N Verma
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Martin Stiemerling
- RE: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Ralph Droms
- RE: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Jim Bound
- RE: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Bernie Volz (EUD)
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Ted Lemon
- RE: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6 Ralph Droms