[dhcwg] Load Balancing for DHCPv6 -01
Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com> Mon, 24 September 2012 18:57 UTC
Return-Path: <akostur@incognito.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A123621F8877 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.744
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.744 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.233, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5fUgLPGgTnAq for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na3sys010aog105.obsmtp.com (na3sys010aog105.obsmtp.com [74.125.245.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7446921F8873 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:57:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.216.51]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys010aob105.postini.com ([74.125.244.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUGCtBO8jio87gDBIyyHkKS7gU+wvMuRH@postini.com; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:57:09 PDT
Received: by qabj40 with SMTP id j40so3426670qab.10 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=tlZWg3CNsnp/bAddB5EkJBmRnyGuVitSnO4Iy6HzGS8=; b=gb8qaGDbtCKZf3+0DI1AXAmFvueWzAKYtjJqhDdqEsp5KdZoRz8CO3I6Vc30+287jH wiCZBbMEKqGU/9Gf4OdYCpSp8vCzdHy7WyCgevwDY1VeZ2KiICgJiMp+0fNYX7kN5k8m Y0MCJ8QKIrsWOD6R9xoiJEVYOzBFnkGkveioe0MODZjrBijFUnUF+yW0RE8NaXVoDQpf XOK+UhZ2qQVYnuPmtsTuYHMjtKvuVUzV+IDbH1P3zY8wNEVl6wKgCq9OlXTpiYTqJve8 KN77Ge4SHpDUTbTOJgDTkJ7CYDtU3hN2U9nthpPrjOXeZ7ubKo08kOoA9n5x8yWvKFM8 cW5w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.252.196 with SMTP id mx4mr8723887qcb.16.1348513027734; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.65.67 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:57:07 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL10_Brja7ZDJ46YJHm87MZC5xQGSc1KhLkyJ+zJ1phqh-ygeg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkIVCTbYABQCqUasronCGl7aIQzlx8zvzQuJVVJRB7gd7m+WGHawWe+dcK2Qh2uTKCRt+3T
Subject: [dhcwg] Load Balancing for DHCPv6 -01
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:57:10 -0000
Dear all: I have submitted an updated I-D updating RFC 3074 to apply to DHCPv6. The text is available at: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kostur-dhc-loadbv6-01.txt Major changes: Added a new Section 3.1 to discuss the requests with a Server ID specified. Modified the specification of the STID to remove the restriction to 16 bytes. Remaining currently outstanding item: There is still outstanding discussion around whether section 3.1 may apply to all messages, vs. whether a server should always answer a Release and/or Decline. See discussion between myself and Bernie. Comments and suggestions welcome. I am looking to have the WG take this on as a work item. -- Andre Kostur
- [dhcwg] Load Balancing for DHCPv6 -01 Andre Kostur
- Re: [dhcwg] Load Balancing for DHCPv6 -01 Bernie Volz (volz)