IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] RECONFIGURE Triggered by DHCPv6 Relay Agents (draft-boucadair-dhc-triggered-reconfigure)

Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com> Fri, 24 August 2012 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <akostur@incognito.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E182921F8504 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.072, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V7uLfJVMvVwv for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na3sys010aog107.obsmtp.com (na3sys010aog107.obsmtp.com [74.125.245.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3950821F850C for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys010aob107.postini.com ([74.125.244.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUDeiJ2J96PnmUr4OMR4gsOlgnw8FEjJu@postini.com; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:47:52 PDT
Received: by qaas11 with SMTP id s11so598348qaa.19 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=0AyAz9soR2po2E42Hl+cwY9Z0ud1s3Bq6SayQ+sqRro=; b=CpmAn1alxkq4GKecZNjXDdLdP5frjbVGyHhMMR7pFd4Fkl4RMGAzpdN1BJxSCh/iq/ M7mxnTK6mxawfNQ6xCqzvdabBx1ktyqT4RArTEQW2UBxhRcSfQwO853Jo83BjwyvXgHP Lxv1rat6g7muTTVFd11zSeghnuotzc9MxBrCX4pfARn2s88xLhieJChaQbU6/JjTcAWM mCfkyQlf5p1tw+hSq9xkIz2gHpk2BwutgyijDVc5Ow+jbIdcQwhepYY4d+4CvvnYXGj8 Kzy91RSUX0aej869brPWahC3K6op0JH7P1pivDbj9mT0+lzt1XR82mH7RBU+0kL3G1pL mgdg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.214.67 with SMTP id gz3mr9487434qab.70.1345823271139; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.32.4 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E5332AAED@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E5332AA39@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CAL10_BrupUkEdssHn7wYphT3yw6LCcnqc7mJOMdxiuTOhC-=Lw@mail.gmail.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E5332AAED@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:47:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL10_Bo4kE6WWKVYmKBXM3S6Nz_yqKQQ1Ma0Vnenb3nQgjdz5g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn23ZDxh/xKmK8SwRVfmGj36G0C1T969grTmfSyQtCFOsvR1wJtCMZs9DckxYRdXTlxCxin
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] RECONFIGURE Triggered by DHCPv6 Relay Agents (draft-boucadair-dhc-triggered-reconfigure)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:47:53 -0000

Normally the server is being told administratively to reconfigure a
client, and presumably which of the three methods to use.  This is
just another form of that.   I could see it being changed to: the RA
MAY supply an OPTION_RECONF_MSG, and if not supplied, the server may
determine which form of Reconfigure to use.

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 8:35 AM,  <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:
> Dear Andre,
>
> Please see inline.
>
> Cheers,
> Med
>
>>-----Message d'origine-----
>>De : Andre Kostur [mailto:akostur@incognito.com]
>>Envoyé : vendredi 24 août 2012 17:17
>>À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP
>>Cc : dhcwg@ietf.org
>>Objet : Re: [dhcwg] RECONFIGURE Triggered by DHCPv6 Relay
>>Agents (draft-boucadair-dhc-triggered-reconfigure)
>>
>>A question that popped into my mind is how does the server decide
>>whether the client will be doing a Renew, Rebind, or
>>Information-Request?  Perhaps the RA MUST supply an OPTION_RECONF_MSG?
>
> Med: What I had initially in mind for this new message: is to not require any change to the way RECONFIGURE is managed by the server but only provide a signal to the DHCPv6 server to issue one. Is there any particular reason you think the RA should be involved in that process?
>
>>
>>Also, is the RA expected to monitor the clients as to whether they are
>>reconfigure capable, or will the RA rely on the server to be watching
>>that?
>
> Med: I would say no.
>
>    Do we want the server to be able to report back to the RA that
>>the client cannot do Reconfigure?
>
> Med: I would say no.
>
>>
>>
>>On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:49 AM, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I submitted a new I-D defining a new message type to trigger
>>a server to
>>> issue a RECONFIGURE message when RSSO is used.
>>>
>>> The text is available at:
>>>
>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-dhc-triggered-
>>reconfigure
>>>
>>> Comments and suggestions are more than welcome.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Med
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dhcwg mailing list
>>> dhcwg@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Andre Kostur
>>



-- 
Andre Kostur
Senior Product Design Engineer
P: 604-678-2864
E: akostur@incognito.com
Toll-Free: 1-800-877-1856


F: 604-678-2864
VoIP: sip:864@sip.incognito.com

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status