[dhcwg] [Errata Verified] RFC5007 (4816)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 08 February 2021 09:21 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2B23A1500; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 01:21:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id co8qSLQ9ZrJC; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 01:21:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB2193A14FF; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 01:21:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id B8EE5F4075E; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 01:20:42 -0800 (PST)
To: sander@steffann.nl, john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com, kkinnear@cisco.com, volz@cisco.com, szeng@cisco.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: evyncke@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, dhcwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210208092042.B8EE5F4075E@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 01:20:42 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/VX9xeJNp-CJM6Sc-GDNcR5qceiA>
Subject: [dhcwg] [Errata Verified] RFC5007 (4816)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 09:21:08 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC5007,
"DHCPv6 Leasequery". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4816

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Date Reported: 2016-10-02
Verified by: Eric Vyncke (IESG)

Section: GLOBAL

Original Text
-------------
There are references to OPTION_CLIENT_LINK, which doesn't exist.

Corrected Text
--------------
The references are apparently for option 48: OPTION_LQ_CLIENT_LINK.

Notes
-----
-- Verifier note --
Section 4.1.2.5 of this RFC indeed specifies OPTION_LQ_CLIENT_LINK (the DHCPv6 IANA registry also uses OPTION_LQ_CLIENT_LINK). So, sections 4.3.3 and 4.4.1 should use "OPTION_LQ_CLIENT_LINK" rather than "OPTION_CLIENT_LINK".

--------------------------------------
RFC5007 (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-leasequery-01)
--------------------------------------
Title               : DHCPv6 Leasequery
Publication Date    : September 2007
Author(s)           : J. Brzozowski, K. Kinnear, B. Volz, S. Zeng
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Dynamic Host Configuration
Area                : Internet
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG