[dhcwg] Static IP's vs. DHCP for NT/Win2K servers
"Handy, Norman W." <Norman.Handy@nscorp.com> Thu, 18 April 2002 22:39 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA24805 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:39:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id SAA09793 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:39:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA09617; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:37:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA20567 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 14:00:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nscorp.com (gip-8-2.nscorp.com [167.121.8.2]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA17285 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 14:00:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from svcs44.atldc.nscorp.com (svcs44-dmz [10.4.30.42]) by nscorp.com (8.9.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA22460 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 13:59:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from gaatlitexch03s.atldc.nscorp.com ([10.2.246.75]) by svcs44.atldc.nscorp.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GURZBV00.10G for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 13:59:55 -0400
Received: by gaatlitexch03s.atldc.nscorp.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <JFDSY4RJ>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 13:59:15 -0400
Message-ID: <C9E5E5124D7F984E8BA307B0A84684F201D6AFDB@exch04s-172>
From: "Handy, Norman W." <Norman.Handy@nscorp.com>
To: "'dhcwg@ietf.org'" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 13:59:08 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C1E702.BCDE2330"
Subject: [dhcwg] Static IP's vs. DHCP for NT/Win2K servers
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
My Distributed Systems Group is proposing using MAC address resolution and having DHCP assign IP's instead of using static ip's in our WinTel environment. What are the benefits and what are the drawbacks of using this type of scenario. We use over 180 WinTel servers (all Compaq and Dell) and all have static IP's. Any assistance will be greatly appreciated. Norman Handy Network Services Architecture Norfolk Southern Corporation
- [dhcwg] Static IP's vs. DHCP for NT/Win2K servers Handy, Norman W.
- Re: [dhcwg] Static IP's vs. DHCP for NT/Win2K ser… Ted Lemon