Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04.txt

ianfarrer@gmx.com Mon, 30 November 2020 08:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ianfarrer@gmx.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF57F3A111E for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 00:31:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G9DTBeAaFJeZ for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 00:31:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D27693A111A for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 00:31:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1606725078; bh=Ox5Pr2a+SwQTupLvOdqdoK2vqnrkfxz/I4H5iUF+4nI=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To; b=QxSN+dkUKZP08gQDSCDXyjdi6t7KTQUN9MQZZufknmKmAzqfZMUShSTMUKRWsAnrb +89L2UB1O95Xi1xqdxIClIwixipg9TEUIy45PDIn+rz4Q5lSgX9EE9m9uL1ZVWaSLp lD7rB+Pxh844+q3lWcb1VskEObD2WCiub8JBywzA=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from ians-mbp-9.fritz.box ([78.34.168.223]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MEFvp-1kraYF3Aw9-00AEcn for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 09:31:18 +0100
From: ianfarrer@gmx.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\))
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 09:31:17 +0100
References: <160672405144.2070.7872955912702970312@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <160672405144.2070.7872955912702970312@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-Id: <F609DB5E-A490-4869-8B7F-727D5FC67131@gmx.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:3eCuOBstwhMLB0KdqIzaGrm1K+3byGs9aujK0LflBG8OCnlrhBM FeaMaSwx+TsCbB2fjf0VznDM1bv8RppFiMNIefu9zriDjBb7mEuBAfzwSJoOmDPE5ASP1vK V/SfrT3g4xSykau+rVcUOx9PUSWd9sqrq9dD3fC6LRoXzL9gqJKKTy2Api40n0bUCyTPAIS jnqTGiTWgiRDahSaJYw+w==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:vGPRnuLyl2w=:Dn39YPfd+4/QxvKMYvVzlx 8joBcqhTaC4a/owdKGbRRZ71ECC7U3zav6T9h8TxL/kRHsdAP4vlW7Re2OckgMtiaHOdq8roE 3DIvi5Mh4QqsptTwT6g3rXa/AkhMCiOQy6EedwJTDRVm9RQ/Hao357rZduDblghXAh93fV1ch IsgSnjzZdtqIzIUe3y4w/tPLj6XNG4DXwG3LM9j3+fBtNPvJ5EIP7f0exFAosYV/rTcnwsatt OI4pm15zeg0oLaU/YTMqOZQnsfkRye1Y+BeRfdle1KQ6bucTHqgafjHguulOZXK8KKgqDdvcB 9gUzs0rEXHX4baLudZFFpt/tSs2myQT1OTa+dIBWvmeZkIyN5QLDvpOZJs2b45+I984VXT2q/ WkB4U6SEpMeCvzogdTETd7COPuwEgCv81LO/D/okB18iQ5M1V+RnTKvIHCrNhS0rUr0FCVv5y SWTEsCDViSej+ksG5yRIHPTn2W0uOBxk+9IehKqhftiJit4eiulWmf4hpgOwg+DXd9OAoGuI3 bwX0b+mMxs/fFR8tzC+pFI7fSho4pUrnSb2sUCqKgq2a27GEoHUIlHyOozRdboRcG+T0BsuQf mgZ4eNWsRAiGucEG18UfdAdSY/ZwkOD/xDvnvE3Nt7wi8cIeawgodsuqaetUYdbxVdRuKe8vs YuXoH7/GSy7cz04YputWhW4RxbH4Fmv3ySrB4dpup8tZcCWyxy45bAX3f2fUk0Gp46XjEHU5h cAgbpFS+uxb1SkCxGzJM8UV1chUXGxBprFTJ+VzsBFbJzsNgsxa+FLc2SLyohjSYUKy9Frc/T OSBAFMfLl6hEuR5EQon/9T8YEId862jK0jRDqzkCLkF4yNCs/PlUy+AOvUBnEDcVwd9R11iyf VLaZDWFe70SyLaGbafew==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/VwBwWdyxUxabNNCVi4Nn_PFQUJc>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 08:31:24 -0000

Hi,

We’ve just posted an update to the draft with changes based on the AD’s review (thanks Éric).

The main changes are:

1, R-5 has been moved to R-2 as it is related to R-1.
2, R-3 (previously R-2) has the following text added (for consistency with the new R-2 requirement):

The delegating relay's ingress filter entry MUST use the same prefix length for the delegated prefix as given in the IA_PD.

3, S-1 has been reworded to remove redundant text:

To preserve active client prefix delegations across relay restarts, the relay SHOULD implement at least one of the	
 following:

In addition, there are a few small changes in the language for clarity.

Thanks,
Ian


> On 30. Nov 2020, at 09:14, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Dynamic Host Configuration WG of the IETF.
> 
>        Title           : DHCPv6 Prefix Delegating Relay Requirements
>        Authors         : Ian Farrer
>                          Naveen Kottapalli
>                          Martin Hunek
>                          Richard Patterson
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04.txt
> 	Pages           : 12
> 	Date            : 2020-11-30
> 
> Abstract:
>   This memo describes operational problems that are known to occur when
>   using DHCPv6 relays with Prefix Delegation.  These problems can
>   prevent successful delegation and result in routing failures.  To
>   address these problems, this memo provides necessary functional
>   requirements for operating DHCPv6 relays with Prefix Delegation.
> 
>   It is recommended that any network operator that is using DHCPv6
>   prefix delegation with relays should ensure that these requirements
>   are followed on their networks.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements/
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg