Re: [dhcwg] Revision of DHCPv6 DNS configuration options
Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 03 March 2003 01:45 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA23419; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 20:45:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h231spp17332; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 20:54:51 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h231rfp17248 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 20:53:41 -0500
Received: from toccata.fugue.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA23389 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 20:43:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nominum.com (dsl093-187-232.chi2.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.187.232]) by toccata.fugue.com (8.11.6/8.6.11) with ESMTP id h231fqJ01752; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 19:41:52 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 19:45:36 -0600
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Revision of DHCPv6 DNS configuration options
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551)
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
To: Jun Xie <junxie@cisco.com>
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20030301110208.00adf460@mira-sjcm-2.cisco.com>
Message-Id: <D48421BD-4D19-11D7-92CB-00039317663C@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Since > those clients can not go beyond the site, the answers they get from the > servers are final resolution for them. If the option really represents > name > servers that can do recursive resolution, this should be clearly > specified. > Even in this case, "name server" is still more appropriate than > "resolver" > for the name of the option. I don't think it's useful for us to continue discussing this. _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] Revision of DHCPv6 DNS configuration opti… Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Revision of DHCPv6 DNS configuration … Jun Xie
- Re: [dhcwg] Revision of DHCPv6 DNS configuration … Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Revision of DHCPv6 DNS configuration … Jun Xie
- Re: [dhcwg] Revision of DHCPv6 DNS configuration … Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Revision of DHCPv6 DNS configuration … Jun Xie
- Re: [dhcwg] Revision of DHCPv6 DNS configuration … Jun Xie
- RE: [dhcwg] Revision of DHCPv6 DNS configuration … Bernie Volz (EUD)
- Re: [dhcwg] Revision of DHCPv6 DNS configuration … Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Revision of DHCPv6 DNS configuration … Robert Elz
- [dhcwg] Revision of DHCPv6 DNS configuration opti… Ed Sawicki