IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue-05: (with COMMENT)

tianxiang li <peter416733@gmail.com> Thu, 16 February 2017 01:58 UTC

Return-Path: <peter416733@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3751293FE; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 17:58:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.489
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.489 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EOIohlDT9qwe; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 17:58:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x231.google.com (mail-ot0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19633129C43; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 17:58:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 73so2726139otj.0; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 17:58:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=n+oxyq8r6aDqqHujwBoSXql9OxksVsgde5Z0nLkWgF8=; b=vRUl/MwHG4zD3DbUZJLdGSV7rnEWWtgB3sno8NXT8rds6uheqfddvvFTEQZjTcu35K NPqsYcKFArCKPsO2/3ER6hV7YQ6yZG3XgpSlxLGDZEckhF7+iYVpJlsZmxhs/3KBQMYO G0Icvxt484RkyJGH/9/mN4gNMDnLOiW2zzypLWo8hFwBnmtu8Wm/oIueDwdVxVLQgWsz sMXO5TfCA78WN+d25wvHIphPGmGFCk1b9aGM0Xwr054VxBZiMiHIKfNjkiiJAdii7A4P sMLf8BBeMBaPV3XDL8rqyFYYsU1JPPgM6Y91zt6OSmXU3xjMNiOa/GcbEOM2mWRqbFem X2IQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=n+oxyq8r6aDqqHujwBoSXql9OxksVsgde5Z0nLkWgF8=; b=hWjNaU5k+9z8PdLBZXA+547ddsDy0xA3Cv5CeNObztgXJzgFJCNYtFz4ldYdiXxL8r 94rGzmNmq60xdAj+2y8w/BT9OAOY6IE57AXaBvvKD9fExMBM6f/nFvLP2jriMRIz64QR NHTccXRRvxU15q0AaqY+5wdJeHW02W/ozCEPWzJ/DA6PssJegRiXnMX0CMHjr5njmkDy KljHCABetor/ZZ7dHRS0mdZ94aA/v7RbQXQqQvyrdP+zDspMahPGJoZo3uvib3sRVMjp H0vz7Js5xxsPrOOj/7xjpHCdbOYwAZZr4KNJFfgxlUhwl0FTU/fT+OA8w4wIyP5sBhJo nCCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39n5D6q/yFLNbtBVKa1sVX3DWp3PMVVmnBfbSzArQQ+hRsPL3vIGYzhvgqTAzWGNPW/RHRZmmcnPaUH9mg==
X-Received: by 10.157.52.253 with SMTP id t58mr22726256otd.161.1487210315438; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 17:58:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.1.202 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 17:57:55 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <148715302215.17389.14651452070558302618.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <148715302215.17389.14651452070558302618.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: tianxiang li <peter416733@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:57:55 +0800
Message-ID: <CAFx+hEMJAJ7Q2-cm_0q=OSjvyYhijd_Y0CobngHKxOKUZn-g6g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140a4628ee19c05489c2280"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/WHQbKv9hmAlWrn-x0wH60RCUALs>
Cc: dhc-chairs@ietf.org, Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 01:58:37 -0000

Hi Mirja,

Thank you for the review and suggestion. I think we could make a pointer to
say this document updates RFC 3633.
We'll add this in the updated document.

Cheers,
Tianxiang

2017-02-15 18:03 GMT+08:00 Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>:

> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue-05: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefi
> x-length-hint-issue/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I think it would make sense if this doc updates RFC 3633 because someone
> who (newly) implements RFC 3633 should really also read this document and
> hance needs this pointer.
>
> Also, I would move section 3.6 to the beginning but that doesn't really
> matter.
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email