IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Re: one more comment about the lifetime option

JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Thu, 02 September 2004 09:45 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA16753; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 05:45:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C2o1G-0000Yo-IW; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 05:36:38 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C2nm7-0001QA-L3 for dhcwg@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 05:20:59 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA15271 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 05:20:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp ([202.249.10.124]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2noT-0000AD-4k for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 05:23:26 -0400
Received: from ocean.jinmei.org (unknown [3ffe:501:100f:1048:79b7:3eeb:f7f7:b9ee]) by shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DA615272; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 18:20:56 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 18:20:57 +0900
Message-ID: <y7vy8jt3u2u.wl@ocean.jinmei.org>
From: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
To: Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Re: one more comment about the lifetime option
In-Reply-To: <001401c48a3e$2ededf20$6401a8c0@amer.cisco.com>
References: <EBBCE159-F510-11D8-AE27-000A95D9C74C@nominum.com> <001401c48a3e$2ededf20$6401a8c0@amer.cisco.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
Organization: Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, Japan.
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, 'Ted Lemon' <mellon@nominum.com>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org

(forgot to reply to this...)

I've changed the order of the citation below.

>>>>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 20:55:14 -0400, 
>>>>> "Bernie Volz" <volz@cisco.com> said:

>> > We should also restrict the position where the lifetime option can
>> > appear: it should only be able to appear at the "top level" 
>> of option 
>> > hierarchy.
>> 
>> I think this is a good idea.

> If it is restricted to a REPLY to an INFORMATION-REQUEST, there is
> no need for this explicit statement as that's all that is currently
> possible - there are no IA_NA, IA_TA, or IA_PD options for these
> messages.

I don't think this is really the case.  An authentication option can
be used with Information-request and can have sub-options.

					JINMEI, Tatuya
					Communication Platform Lab.
					Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
					jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email