Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-10 & Reconfigure
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 06 February 2018 17:08 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66FD12D84F for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 09:08:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bq2ecNpFqfEJ for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 09:08:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22e.google.com (mail-qk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C5F612D84A for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 09:08:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id d18so3199034qke.7 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 09:08:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Bz0EzHx20b9Iip3hmWJUdCItHlTRhNI9qoxwTa0d/x8=; b=OAc2fI7vf520VW3mxP6eKwh4V5dQL7+RmlrKl0A4vn2MwGkUkSvxgJ0mPs8pTgdHiy LKxO07ZlsfRJRmWhs+C9SHR23P9rWBko/AGOzWZ+XgBt8qOLJBPGznn1nuRH71P7LShF tEK5D4rz0DohluLRF7+qXukqiGJFTdeZrVD6ecwNy9u9tYR7KR1UCEBx8T33DLiZan0I Kx0ckNUrE0X8VRDVGYyA+DmSX8NA+0JC5TS8oDJoyi0rvFLFpR5g2SReHuQ+C+MhOww1 k9G6J7keAU6ze6sgpe1KrEPjlD+GVtqCVUQYvf8Z/tQOafHhZNa1yMOLZFAmWscf08Io VUIQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Bz0EzHx20b9Iip3hmWJUdCItHlTRhNI9qoxwTa0d/x8=; b=K/agSD7yyS9K7Bn7N1SbOY0Nm9ZYtRb51Vz7Be7Uz8ieAupBTPAYqwRM90IC4EZAov zygjPeJTS8rFivguFZWFF0QA6kTVnKBmvvLFPwF6URVVHUNXNdbCwDHPsHTR5RN9g8NF IdMS954TMQUsZY7eF59CLyLh+D2tPMgUvZfSWNzficGWOq0fopLfai47UdIZIjje9pPq CLkOtLJirbOHNalVjuOuHurLvPxtebcXMhiLwdlr+etzhAYFqWrO2dd6UgfU2FMuZCTT vumebkKpNSbsVQGTKfzr5dV8ZchQnjKz2UK5Aa5baDnWmAibAVYWOdnU3/6zK7ymgHc1 0iCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPC/YCxK9yCzJOosujR1HzrNbRWFHEmwaSRb3jrBksvo3jPfJnD9 dpe5TcpzPe83GfnwBKFxpDq8DA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225ln5oBO3mZPvJUcODWUqbg3OrzB/CjuC6vIwPjrlLGa0G2aDb0COi6NE4M1yj8KcUy14pa7Q==
X-Received: by 10.55.45.195 with SMTP id t186mr2618809qkh.246.1517936915522; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 09:08:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cavall.lan (c-24-60-163-103.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.60.163.103]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u50sm1117844qth.32.2018.02.06.09.08.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 06 Feb 2018 09:08:34 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <7B57070A-E696-4A5C-BA36-0EE30AD531DF@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B3EC2A7F-7606-4EE9-9E4F-50C35383D696"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 12:08:33 -0500
In-Reply-To: <a1104b1b903d4e319c59c1459dbfd701@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port@ietf.org>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
References: <a1104b1b903d4e319c59c1459dbfd701@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/XHpMMkXAIEbJGRCUo_N4XfcvQ3g>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-10 & Reconfigure
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 17:08:39 -0000
On Feb 6, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote: > I’m not sure if we should (or can) put a hold on RFC-to-be to add something about this? Ask Suresh. I don't think this changes the meaning of the document, so it is at least not completely unreasonable to address it in auth48.
- [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-10 & Reconfigure Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-10 & Reconf… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-10 & Reconf… Naiming Shen (naiming)
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-10 & Reconf… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-10 & Reconf… Naiming Shen (naiming)