Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-client-id-02 [really -04]
"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Mon, 13 August 2012 14:45 UTC
Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD29721F8513 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 07:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ngEeQYi9VGx2 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 07:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419FD21F84EB for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 07:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1241; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1344869144; x=1346078744; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=62Mx9gIqzYitAkRopYawCeTdnILr0WRHoAryoNJbPCM=; b=dKP+7uFwuBQ8XVawHVCcMzdbox6qO+vqgV6YwluyRj2UU997r3IgsYXn e3iDD0OdFku7LrIyZvQenYN/WwNQXUF9eXf7lfqs02udCrOUodEwE6sCO s8UUNmuvsxluHAay4SXcKfeHpNfdKQA9YYRR5vZZGB0cydmYME9oysMT3 Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAFYSKVCtJXG//2dsb2JhbABFugWBB4IgAQEBBAEBAQ8BCh00CwwGAQgRBAEBCxQJLgsUCQkBBAENBQgah2sLl2+gDwSLEoVRYAOjdYFmgl8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,761,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="108040790"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Aug 2012 14:45:43 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com [173.37.183.77]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7DEjhEP015829 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:45:43 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.159]) by xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([173.37.183.77]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:45:43 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-client-id-02 [really -04]
Thread-Index: Ac15YUfwlGgq0q+jR2GO+r7urotZWw==
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:45:43 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E0F4EA3E4@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.248.186]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19108.006
x-tm-as-result: No--30.375200-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "narasimha.nelakuditi@nokia.com" <narasimha.nelakuditi@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-client-id-02 [really -04]
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:45:44 -0000
The current draft is 04, not 02. I am OK with advancing this draft. However, might be nice to also include DHCPINFORM in this document? The DHCPACK sent in response should also include the Client Identifier option if sent in by the client (while this is generally not broadcast and may not suffer the same issues as the other messages, just be clean to allow the server to have consistent processing to include the Client Identifier in all responses to the client). - Bernie -----Original Message----- From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 9:35 AM To: dhc WG Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-client-id-02 The authors have requested a working group last call for this draft. This is the document that clarifies the use of the DHCP client identifier by DHCP servers, particularly in cases where chaddr is zero. Please review the draft and indicate on the mailing list whether you support its advancement or oppose its advancement. We will determine consensus on August 24. _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-client-id-02 [re… Bernie Volz (volz)