Re: [dhcwg] WG last calls on several WG documents

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 15 January 2007 19:57 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H6XxH-0004yo-EH; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:57:19 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H6XxG-0004ye-DG for dhcwg@ietf.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:57:18 -0500
Received: from shell-ng.nominum.com ([81.200.64.181]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H6XxF-0000xb-1l for dhcwg@ietf.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:57:18 -0500
Received: from mail.nominum.com (mail.nominum.com [81.200.64.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by shell-ng.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476125682B for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:57:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.4 tests=AWL: -0.770,BAYES_99: 3.67,USER_IN_WHITELIST: -30, CUSTOM_RULE_FROM: ALLOW,TOTAL_SCORE: -27.100
X-Spam-Level:
Received: from [66.93.162.135] ([66.93.162.135]) (authenticated user mellon@nominum.com) by mail.nominum.com (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128 bits)) for dhcwg@ietf.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:57:06 -0800
Message-Id: <1F949FC9-38B2-4B6D-A9F2-094DC2263B20@nominum.com>
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A10177459F@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Smtp-Server: mail.nominum.com:mellon
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v856)
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WG last calls on several WG documents
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:57:05 -0700
References: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A10177459F@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.856)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7bac9cb154eb5790ae3b2913587a40de
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org

On Jan 15, 2007, at 10:15 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> Thanks; this gives additional information that would
> have allowed me to say  "yes" instead of "no opinion"
> to Leasequery and Relay Agent Echo Request Option.

Likewise I'm now happier about the Leasequery option.   Thanks, Bernie!

I support both the Leasequery and ERO options advancing.



_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg