[dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-02 - Respond by September 12, 2016

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Sun, 21 August 2016 23:18 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D259E12B029 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 16:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -13.669
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KqXMIPPzXaBV for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 16:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D91512B027 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 16:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5168; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1471821494; x=1473031094; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=LPta7qVyubMWerI1/+hzDY4XfJI/bfYVhFhUPv51yy4=; b=Jmq46bgooqso0+P6aUv/MXH22b3kIOVMvBJMSlqy2wv/taDICC/jStT0 V2q4KttgkMce9jzoJLjztPMjTJ9tFdJa/Sbydl/W8XAfyN0lP/qMwTo/o Ee9KY+/rmfeYrSVbRWYSW0je/muOBR+qEOSV8jcUpY3f1UOfZGGFzxl1W Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,557,1464652800"; d="scan'208,217";a="313695845"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 21 Aug 2016 23:18:13 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (xch-aln-005.cisco.com []) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7LNIDhL010058 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 23:18:13 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ( by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 18:18:12 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ([]) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 18:18:12 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-02 - Respond by September 12, 2016
Thread-Index: AdH392+aAsGEpWGCSKmqSKIM1tuxsA==
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 23:18:12 +0000
Message-ID: <258822dc0efd4a3daa19eb64086b5de7@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_258822dc0efd4a3daa19eb64086b5de7XCHALN003ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/YYXpsEP6U-WtIl6JILfnW_MHFJw>
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-02 - Respond by September 12, 2016
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 23:18:16 -0000

Hi all,

This message starts the DHC Working Group Last Call to advance draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-02, DHCPv6 Failover Protocol. This document's intended status is Proposed Standard. At present, there is no IPR file against this document.

Please send your comments by September 12, 2016. If you do not feel this  document should advance, please state your reasons why.

Note: We are trying another WGLC based on the discussion regarding this document led by Tomek at the Berlin (IETF-96) meeting and the feedback from those in attendance (see https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96-dhc).

Bernie Volz is the assigned shepherd (Tomek is a co-author).

- Tomek & Bernie

PS: I decided to make this a 3 week WGLC because some may still be on summer holiday and because of Labor Day (September 5) in the United States. And, some may be need a break from reviewing draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 for the just ending WGLC (August 22nd).