Return-Path: X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D259E12B029 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 16:18:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -13.669 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KqXMIPPzXaBV for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 16:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D91512B027 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 16:18:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5168; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1471821494; x=1473031094; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=LPta7qVyubMWerI1/+hzDY4XfJI/bfYVhFhUPv51yy4=; b=Jmq46bgooqso0+P6aUv/MXH22b3kIOVMvBJMSlqy2wv/taDICC/jStT0 V2q4KttgkMce9jzoJLjztPMjTJ9tFdJa/Sbydl/W8XAfyN0lP/qMwTo/o Ee9KY+/rmfeYrSVbRWYSW0je/muOBR+qEOSV8jcUpY3f1UOfZGGFzxl1W Y=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BxAgCVNbpX/4sNJK1egnZOVoEDsmeCe?= =?us-ascii?q?YIPgX0khyk4FAIBAQEBAQEBXhwLhGUtXgGBACYBBBuIKQ6dC58+AQEBAQEBBAE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQEbBYwxiGIFmUgBjxeBdIRciQeMP4N3AR42gkWBNYZsfwEBAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,557,1464652800"; d="scan'208,217";a="313695845" Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 21 Aug 2016 23:18:13 +0000 Received: from XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (xch-aln-005.cisco.com [173.36.7.15]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7LNIDhL010058 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 23:18:13 GMT Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 18:18:12 -0500 Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 18:18:12 -0500 From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-02 - Respond by September 12, 2016 Thread-Index: AdH392+aAsGEpWGCSKmqSKIM1tuxsA== Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 23:18:12 +0000 Message-ID: <258822dc0efd4a3daa19eb64086b5de7@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.98.1.196] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_258822dc0efd4a3daa19eb64086b5de7XCHALN003ciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-02 - Respond by September 12, 2016 X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 23:18:16 -0000 --_000_258822dc0efd4a3daa19eb64086b5de7XCHALN003ciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, This message starts the DHC Working Group Last Call to advance draft-ietf-d= hc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-02, DHCPv6 Failover Protocol. This document's i= ntended status is Proposed Standard. At present, there is no IPR file again= st this document. Please send your comments by September 12, 2016. If you do not feel this d= ocument should advance, please state your reasons why. Note: We are trying another WGLC based on the discussion regarding this doc= ument led by Tomek at the Berlin (IETF-96) meeting and the feedback from th= ose in attendance (see https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-= 96-dhc). Bernie Volz is the assigned shepherd (Tomek is a co-author). - Tomek & Bernie PS: I decided to make this a 3 week WGLC because some may still be on summe= r holiday and because of Labor Day (September 5) in the United States. And,= some may be need a break from reviewing draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 for t= he just ending WGLC (August 22nd). --_000_258822dc0efd4a3daa19eb64086b5de7XCHALN003ciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

 

This message starts the DHC Working Group Last Ca= ll to advance draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-02, DHCPv6 Failover P= rotocol. This document’s intended status is Proposed Standard. At pre= sent, there is no IPR file against this document.

 

Please send your comments by September 12, 2016. = If you do not feel this  document should advance, please state your re= asons why.

 

Note: We are trying another WGLC based on the dis= cussion regarding this document led by Tomek at the Berlin (IETF-96) meetin= g and the feedback from those in attendance (see http= s://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96-dhc).

 

Bernie Volz is the assigned shepherd (Tomek is a = co-author).

 

- Tomek & Bernie

 

PS: I decided to make this a 3 week WGLC because = some may still be on summer holiday and because of Labor Day (September 5) = in the United States. And, some may be need a break from reviewing draft-ie= tf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 for the just ending WGLC (August 22nd).

 

--_000_258822dc0efd4a3daa19eb64086b5de7XCHALN003ciscocom_--