RE: [dhcwg] DHC WG charter

Why don't we just then change this part to read "Complete work on ..." (remove "or terminate"). I don't believe we want to terminate anything on the list yet.

- Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Narten [mailto:narten@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:35 PM
To: Ralph Droms
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DHC WG charter 

> The posted charter has been revised based on Bernie's input...

Looks pretty good overall.

But one thing seems odd:

> Complete or terminate work on DHCP ...

And then lists all the relevant WG drafts.

I think everyone will agree that the majority of the listed IDs stay
as WG items. Maybe a small number should be terminated?

We should have the discussion now about which documents are in and
which are no longer needed/appropriate. After all, the (re)chartering
process is about aligning the charter with the work being done.

There may be cases where there is a specific document that we don't
really know today what to do with it, that's OK, so long as it is
clear in the milestone (or charter) that the first order of business
is to figure out what to do with it (i.e., before additional work is
done on it).

But I don't think the charter should leave it so open ended as to
which IDs may or may not be kept.

Thomas

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg