Re: [dhcwg] "Options" field

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 16 May 2002 18:49 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA06053 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2002 14:49:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id OAA06181 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 16 May 2002 14:49:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA06127; Thu, 16 May 2002 14:47:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA06102 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2002 14:47:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from toccata.fugue.com (toccata.fugue.com [204.152.186.142]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA06000 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2002 14:47:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from green.bisbee.fugue.com (dsl-64-193-175-153.telocity.com [64.193.175.153]) by toccata.fugue.com (8.11.3/8.6.11) with ESMTP id g4GIk5S11388; Thu, 16 May 2002 11:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tongpanyi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.bisbee.fugue.com (8.10.2/8.6.11) with ESMTP id g4GIlNd03050; Thu, 16 May 2002 13:47:23 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 13:47:22 -0500
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] "Options" field
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v481)
Cc: 'Katia Linker' <KatiaL@radlan.com>, DHCP IETF mailing list <dhcwg@ietf.org>
To: "Kostur, Andre" <Andre@incognito.com>
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FB49E60CFBA724E88867317DAA3D1984958A3@homer.incognito.com.>
Message-Id: <5BA10180-68FD-11D6-8581-00039367340A@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by optimus.ietf.org id OAA06103
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

> I don't disagree that in the absence of information to the contrary, the 
> largest packet that a server can expect the client to handle is 576 bytes.
>   However, if the client sends option 57 specifying that the largest DHCP 
> packet that it is willing to handle is 1400 bytes, then the options field 
> is 1400 - 286 = 1136 bytes.  Thus, the maximum size that the options field 
> may be is much larger than the 312 bytes mentioned in RFC 2131.  (The data 
> within the options field may not take up the entire field).

Ah, I see.   We meant different things by "maximum size."   Sigh.   :'}


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg